Quote:
Like I said, I’ll take my chances knowing my experiences with making people laugh over your opinion. I also wouldn’t give a shit if she liked it all that much or not – since I’d have no investment in her at that point in time. That lack of neediness would be considered attractive. It would be conveyed in how I speak and carry myself. Win-win. End of this story.
You're shit is corny.
Quote:
What a lame comment. I don’t know what the hell *you* mean by flirting, since you never describe it (it’s in some mythical post?), but I sure know what it means to me. If a guy asked me about flirting specifically, I’d tell him my version of it.
Search function. Use it. I've told guys to flirt and they've understood it. You don't. I've had guys ask for an example of how I'd flirt, and I gave it to them. You see what I mean by being smart enough to ask what somebody means if the definition isn't clear?
Quote:
Glad the feeling is mutual.
I'm glad you agree that your advice is shit and half-assed.
Quote:
I’m not going to write a book. I’m going to help guys step by step here. Most guys come on here at the point where they haven’t even asked the girl out. Don’t you get it? If they actually had a date set up and wanted flirting/escalation advice, they’d get that, specifically.
This is the point I'm trying to get across to you. You're on a pickup site. You tell a guy to be friendly but instant flirting is out of the question. Then you tell him to set up a lunch and look for things that you have in common and if you guys have something in common things will naturally happen. My point has been and continues to be, does a guy express attraction? Does he flirt with her during this lunch? You're not demonstrating attraction, even if you think the invitation should say it when you invite her. If you're not demonstrating it at lunch but ask her on a date at a later time, she's not likely going to agree to the date unless
1. she had already found you attractive before the lunch because there would be no spark. Having something in common is not enough of a spark.
2. she's agreeing because she doesn't want to hurt your feelings by turning you down. You have been friendly up to this point.
So the guy takes your advice and gets her to that lunch you left him hanging because the normal piece of advice that we'd give would be to flirt with the girl (if you need an explanation of what I mean by flirting, feel free to ask...otherwise use your own judgment) in order to get a spark that would lead to a date or even bounce to another spot from there. You say that you're not going to help again until he makes the actual date, "so fuck him and his lunch with the girl even though I told him to go to lunch with her."
Quote:
What in the hell am I or someone else supposed to search for in your 4,500 (mostly useless one-liner comment) posts? Too much junk to go through. I’m willing to wager almost not a single poster that sees your advice searched for anything. Put your “quality” stuff in your signature. You don’t have to seek a relationship or do anything at all – I’m not here to help you specifically. On the flip-side, I’m sure plenty of guys on here would love to find a girlfriend (a real deal one, not some bullshit ‘gamed’ or inebriated one) – and I can help them. Step by step. I do wonder if you tell the girls you meet before you sleep with them that you’re just looking for something casual. I really do wonder…
I don't like putting links in my signature. After the update messed up my links before, I've never cared to put the new format in. Why should I search through my 4500 posts just for your benefit?
I've never said that there aren't guys on here that don't want a relationship. You have come here saying that your advice is the advice that gets quality relationships that lead to something meaningful. You constantly put down PUA. So when you tell us that you have the advice that's for that quality relationships and you complain about PUA and the "manosphere", you should be able to give that advice. Your responsibility is greater because you aren't one of us guys that only think with our dicks, so for your help to resonate, you have to give a beginning to end outline since you are different from the rest of us. I'm not saying details. I'm saying a general overview and let guys ask questions if they need for you to fill in the blanks.
What's funny is that I knew you didn't know how I treat women because I've said it many times. The fact that you say that I'm only looking for something casual shows that you don't know what you're talking about when it comes to what I'm doing. But hell, you say I say things that I've never said. Why should I be surprised?
Quote:
One of the things I’m learning in my 20s is that communication between people – basic communication – is at a god-awful level. I see this all the time at work, too, when there’s a research meeting and people talk about various investment terms (equity risk premiums, P/E multiples, cash flow, etc.) These things have varying definitions, and in some cases not clarifying what someone is talking about means you don’t get as much value from the discussion at best or completely misinterpret what they say at worst.
Back here…. We have vague descriptions of issues (problem 1) these guys are having and a vocabulary that has no consensus definition (problem 2) – a lot of words simply carry binary meanings “e.g. Neediness = something bad … alpha = great.” What we end up (often, not always) with is shotgun advice to a problem we barely understand – because those problems compound. That’s what I’m pointing out.
And what’s with you and “bart?” You’re literally obsessed with the him. Do you know for a fact he’s not just a troll who’s screwing around?
Communication is a problem. Like I said, when I'm not sure what somebody may mean at times, I'll ask them. If I interpret what they said incorrectly, they'll tell me. I'm not going to be difficult about it or use it as fuel to argue for no good reason. Most of the time, we get it when someone says something.
I'm not sure why you say I'm obsessed with bart. I usually don't respond on his threads. He called women in LA out and someone asked my thoughts on it since I live here. Then he talked about a woman that won't take his hints and I responded to that recently. If I do respond to one of bart's threads, it's not because I'm thinking I'm going to fix bart. It's because even though he's been here for 5 years, answering some of his questions may benefit someone else if they can appreciate my advice.