Quote:
Investment comes from perceived value. When Manson says a man should always be just a little less invested than the girl, he means your investment in yourself should be higher than your investment in her.
If you were truly invested in yourself, you would realize that any kind of relationship with a prostitute is asinine, and surely you could do better. She probably quit because she caught an STD.
Escorts are people too, and she was a pretty high end escort at that. Statistically speaking prostitutes are actually less likely to catch STD's than girls you sleep with at clubs, because they understand the risks better and are more adamant about using condoms.
That said, I was never seriously thinking a relationship could happen. I'll grant that I fantasized about it, and even asked her out... but I never seriously thought of it as a possibility. I have the same fantasies about the escort I'm seeing now, only with her I don't feel the same.
And that's really the question, why does one girl cause more over investment than another similar girl? (I'm just using escorts as examples because that's what I was thinking about. The same question would apply to a friend I had oneitis for vs. the last couple girls I actually dated.)
Quote:
I personally think oneitis comes from trying to fill some kind of emptiness inside. This person may or may not have it but you get that sense of connection and you crave it once it's gone. I've been particularly good at getting even the most "independent" woman to succumb to my charm and overinvest in me. It's never been made apparent as to why but once you get to know someone, you just tune in to the "emptiness" that the person feels. You "fill" it and that's when the other person starts to become invested emotionally in you.
This might be on the right track, but doesn't address the "similar girls" part of the question. Unless you think Emily was good at "filling" that emptiness?
Quote:
No idea what you're trying to say with that, I never mentioned being nice to anyone...