Quote:
LOL You took this way to personally. Where did I ever say that men without rhythm don't get laid? Thanks for the assumptions, learn to read the thread neutrally before firing away at someone. You are seriously accusing me of statements I never made.
Quote:
You are crazy to think girls will dance with rhythm-less guys, they can't dance with them because the guy isn't dancing.
^There. Basically, "girls will refuse to dance with you because you don't have a rhythm. Therefore, you can't get laid through dance floor game unless you ABSOLUTELY have rhythm" That's basically what your statements are revealing.
I'm making no insane assumptions - you're playing with dangerous words.
Quote:
Go read the book Why Women Have Sex, Cindy Meston and David Buss, both PHDs. Both of them have a research lab based on sex and it is based on their research in the lab. These are interviews of women having sex, the book is also based on multiple studies. Don't know how interested you'd be in it, it is very science orientated, everything is based of reasoning, are you ok with that?
Fair enough. But since you think it's absolutely crazy to assume a woman will dance with a rhythm-less guy - I'm wondering whether or not ^those studies have proven that statement of yours? Do the studies really say "rhythm will get you laid. But for all of you without rhythm: Tough luck. You must be crazy to think a woman will dance with you guys."
Quote:
I'd guarantee, even if you ain't the Mack Daddy on the dance floor you have some rhythm. Just because you ain't off popping and moon walking doesn't mean you are a bad dancer. Appreciate your modesty in proving your point though.
In general, every single person HAS rhythm. Question is, does the rhythm fit perfectly with the music in question, or not? My point is: Your rhythm does not necessarily need to be in an awesome alignment with the music playing in the club. In fact, I don't see a lot of people in clubs that dance with a good rhythm all the time. Not even girls. Everybody just moves their bodies and go wild. Rhythm is not a necessity to dance with a girl. It's BETTER to have it, yes - but it's not essential.
Quote:
Why aren't you required to tell me how not moving(or as little as possible) on a dance floor while dancing with a girl(if that makes sense in any way) builds MORE sexual tension?
You misunderstand. From what I understood by the quote below . . .
Quote:
Falling in sync is very important in courtship, and if you can't have rhythm with them it is quite a turn off. In short it often cuts short courtship because there is no "magic"(intimacy/sexual tension) and Perper's final phase, Synchronization never takes place.
. . . ^We were talking about dance floor game. So if I'm reading the above quote from the perspective of dance floor game - you are stating that you need rhythm and movement to create sexual tension. Which is why I stated that there is less sexual tension the MORE you move. There's no tension in the air if you're jumping around like a monkey but having awesome rhythm. Tension builds when you slow down and/or are not moving at all.
If you ARE saying what I thought you were - ^that is why I'm disagreeing with you. There's a social way of dancing (regular, frequent movements) and there's a sensual way of dancing (slowing down movements, building sexual tension). That was what I meant.