Quote:
I would appreciate if some one here on here who is well versed in speech tonality that can confirm or reject the concept that the raise in the pitch of your voice that signifies a question may be feminine and submissive by nature.
I am not, but I have a really good ear and I assure you it is not. Rising pitch at the end of a sentence indicates a question.
How you are speaking, your delivery, is what makes the "question" sound dominant or submissive. You can ask a "question" without it really being a question, more like a perfunctory addition of syntax to pretty much a command you just gave. Especially if you don't actually wait for a response or leave any room for it. "Dinner at 8 at Sully's, yes? They have really good clamato juice, you'll love it." Technically she could answer "no" but you haven't actually left her the structural window to say "no," you didn't wait for her opinion to confirm that everything's ok. Of course you will want to get a "yes" out of her sometime, lest she fall into silence and never actually plan to go out with you! But it can happen later, all you need to do is sanity check that she actually understood and is on board with the plan.
I think a huge part of "almost" giving a command is that you've done the planning and decision making already. You've avoided the dreary subroutine of "So what do you wanna do?" "I dunno, whadda you wanna do?" "Whatever is fine with you." "I'm fine with anything." "So what should we do? Umm." This isn't leadership and it's boring. I don't actually have a problem handing a gal the reins if she yanks them away from me in a productive manner, I'm not going to fight someone to make sure it's
my decision. "So, dinner at Sully's at 8, yes? Their calamari is to die for." "No, I really want pizza at Coporcino's." "Corpocino's it is then! See you at 8." It's not important whether it ends up being your leadership or her leadership, what's important is that
there is leadership and that
by default it's your leadership. You're going to get this shit happening, that's Alpha behavior. Notice also that even though she changed the venue, you finished by commanding the time. If she didn't have a reason to object to the time, then you might as well finish with it as a command. Your final confirmation of what's going on can be issued as a command.
Oh BTW this is not advanced material, this is rather basic. How do I know that? Because I'm not a PUA.

I have only a rather basic knowledge of tools and techniques and I knew this one. One of the first ways out of AFC behavior is learning and embracing that it's actually ok to order women around, that you do not need their stamp of approval on everything. It doesn't really make you a creep or an asshole, as at a subliminal level they sort of like it. Nor does it mean you have to insist on unwavering domination and control at all times. It just means you are setting a
default pattern of sending decisions at her, rather than a default pattern of of complying and waiting for her approval. The
default pattern trains her, it conditions her expectations.
Also I think it should be realized, that if you end up dating the CEO of some corporation, or a lawyer, or a politician, or some other hard charging dominant gal, that you're simply not going to have dominance over her. If you are a strong and flexible personality yourself this is not going to matter. The point in this case is that
you know how to make decisions and give them too. You are not AFC; this "technique" was about retraining how
you act towards women. You will both have a jolly good time commanding this, commanding that. If you are King, don't be afraid of a Queen who is just as powerful as you are. She might actually be a good mark, because most men probably don't have the confidence to handle her.