Quote:
Too many assumptions. Too much interpretation. Too much ego.
The story of the monk and the boy is a tale of a process towards realization. The story ended because the boy finally exclaimed the correct answer, even though perhaps at the time, he didn't even know it. That's the point. This is not about knowing one thing or another.
"Where were you before you were in your mother's belly"? - We ASSUME that every question has an answer. We ASSUME that before EVERYTHING, there is SOMETHING. We assume, we assume, we assume. What's the fucking question? Where were you before you were in your mother's belly? Not just "no where". Not just "not any time". Not just "Somewhere else". Not just "non existent" or "another existence". It's just a plain "Wake the fuck up bald man! No!!!!!!"
If you can fully understand the boy's journey to his realization, you'll realize your relationship with the monkey instead of going around in circles repeating, "kill the monkey", "don't kill the monkey", "smile", "be happy", "I would just feel. . . ", "I think this, I think that, I would do this, I would do that." . . . Not too different from the mantras of this forum, "I am a PUA. I am high value. I know game. I would to this, I would do that, I think this, I think that, I, I, I, I motherfucking I. . . ."
Care to point how my reading of it is incorrect precisely? You don't need to correct my mistakes as this would render the Koan useless, rather point where I have actually gone wrong.
Are you saying that this Koan has something to do with understanding that the universe may allude us as our minds only work with certain principles in mind, meaning that uncertainty of the future, of the world we live in is something that must be accepted?
That's the two main theme's I'm getting from your story about the monk and the boy. And I can see how the uncertainty one plays a part, the child has to act, but act without knowing the full consequence and he has to accept that he does not know what the consequence will be for him to progress.
Invisiwill: The Koan is kind of a unique teaching tool to Buddhism, the most important thing about a Koan is not that you learn the answer; often the answer is irrelevant but often the reason behind the answer is symbolicaly or metaphorically important which means the point of a Koan is not the answer itself, but understanding the answer and where it came from.
But ultimatly a Koan is symbollic and the semantics come down to who-ever wrote the Koan in question. An answer may be spiritually true, logically sound and well thought out tying up all the angles perfectly.
But still if it's not what the original writer intended it to mean then it's not the "correct" answer.