Reverse, you are correct I had not read his previous posts but upon going back and reading and giving this whole october man debate some thought I have come up with my own view on it which I would love to hear the opinions of others on. Although I do agree with Green Ranger (that OMS is okay to use) on many levles some lines that disturbed me deeply were:
"Do you think im thinking about them girls? Nope if they have to pay 4 therapy then ok"
"Being a PUA is about tricking girls 2 sleep with you anyway."
"But anyone intrested in creating girlfriend and mind control! or anything mega diabolicol Then Private message me! i will be more then happy to TEACH YOU"
which seems to strongly contradict, "I would REVEAL the OMS if wanted women to get hurt but im not."
I think OMS is ideal for anyone who has struggled socially and wants to attract women AS HUMAN BEINGS and not control their emotions like sex dolls. Women tend to be far more caring and compassionate at a core level than most men and the last thing I would ever want to do is hurt one (under most circumstances. As with anything there are exceptions of course)
OMS is not about trying to stir these emotions to hurt women but to enrich the lives of a man and the women he dates. Like pick-up and attraction, OMS gives a woman more of what she desires - FEELINGS.
Personally sex is not the first thing on my mind when meeting a woman. The first thing on my mind when I meet a gorgeous woman is getting to know her as a person and allowing the both of us to create good feelings in one another and let whatever happens happen.
Although empasis on sex seems to be the typical male thought pattern (which there is nothing wrong with, we all have different desires and needs) I can safely say 110% that I use my techinques with the first priority of meeting and getting women to like me in a sexual way but not with the intention of getting them in to bed at a certain speed. To me they are people first and the sex is secondary.
However all interactions are a form of manipulation. If we weren't manipulating women we would not have to do the honorable thing and take a woman through comfort - we could just have sex with her and let buyer's remorse run it's course (no rhyme intended).
Just by using the process of pick-up (such as MM) you are limiting her choice and emotionally compelling her to a point of sleeping with you; all pick-up is a form of hypnosis because you are compelling her to feel certain emotions involutarily.
OMS should NEVER be used purely for sex by any means - such things could damage a woman's psyche. It should be used to strenthen emotional connections and intimacy. We got in to pickup to gain a certain degree of power - not to hurt a woman but to enrich our own lives and OMS is the highest form of that power. Under appropriate use these techinques allow a woman to feel happier and more "in love" than she has ever felt in her life.
As for this "rape" crap you and the woman are both emotionally consenting much in the same way you would be if you used 5-7 hours to stir up her emotional willingness using the Mystery Method. Even without OMS it more than easily possible to "rape" a woman in a similar manner - seducers who skip comfort building do it all the time.
It is not so much a routine as it is a skillset; once you understand the principles behind NLP and hypnosis, it becomes fairly easy to create your own OMS based routines. Something shouldn't be regarded as wrong or forbidden just because someone of high value told you it was.
This of course is just my take on OMS and everyone has a right to their own views and opinions.
- Chris
