Yeah, classic monkey-branch.

I've done this too, though. So I can't judge too harshly. It's just a side effect of abundance mentality.

_________________
Pickup coach. PM for direct, simple coaching.

A woman's career simply doesn't matter. If she's into you, she's into you.

It's all just fun games. Anyone who takes it seriously...well, doesn't really have women around.





Those pics were a joke... a blurry, fully clothed woman in a public place. It could've been a stranger. Looked like awkward side-hug time, too.

Go ahead and post them again.

I've posted images from my home, with my gf holding up your name. The burden of proof is on you, Jack.

_________________
Pickup coach. PM for direct, simple coaching.

I told you what I'd do. It's fair for everyone. Neo will see a picture of me kissing a girl, I'll even send a nude to him a nude of the same girl. I'll be in the picture. You do the same. I'm not going to make a girl hold a sign. If you don't want to do the same, that's on you. Or is there something keeping you from being able to pull that off?

_________________
mpuaforum.proboards.com

That's actually the anti-thesis of "abundance" and more of a scarcity mindset.

Abundance mentality is more about the energy to which you do things. Swinging from relationship to relationship is very much being 'thirsty' or starved as its almost always a way to numb/dissociate one's self from doing the work on themselves. Instead its much like any other addiction, fill the hole within with something else (external). Whether it be a drug, a behavior (gambling, hoarding etc) or another person...its all the same, and its ALL scarcity.


By contrast abundance is the antithesis of being 'thirsty', or engaging in validation-seeking behaviors, for example.
I can be by myself (not in a relationship) and have an abundance mentality even if I choose not to date anyone and remain with myself. Its still abundance, the energy is abundance. If it makes more sense to you, replace the word "abundance" with the word "presence". We delude ourselves into thinking we have abundance because we can create new relationships at a whim (or so we may believe). Does this mean we are abundant? No. That is the illusion.

If you're using other people to RESCUE you from a life you can't stand...as an escape of sorts, you're only playing/deluding yourself - and you are FAR from living life out of any sense of abundance.

Sideways glare

Hey Arch...here's another one of me with the girl in it from earlier today at the beach. Not a photo of a girl that I call my "friend". She has breasts...something that you don't look like you're used to. I have a pic of me kissing her too. I'll send both to Neo or N2, your choice. You do the same with your girl. I'm calling you out. The girl in your pictures isn't your girl. If she is, she'll pose in a picture with you and that way we can be sure that's your house. Let me reiterate. I will send some non-partial guys that have some integrity pictures. We can even send it to a mod of your choice. They will verify that it's me in the pictures with the girls. They will see me kissing the girls. I'll even send them nudes of those same girls (blurring their private areas of course because I'm not trying to exploit them). Notice, I'm saying girls plural. Me kissing multiple girls and nudes of multiple girls. You don't need to go as far as I do. Just a pic of you and your girl kissing to one of those guys. You've described yourself for the forum, so they'll know it's you. If you can't do it, shut the fuck up and quit trying to call people out. I'm not trying to defend R.C because he can do it himself, but I've seen pics with him that proves his game.

You won't do it because you can't. You've talked shit but your shit is limited to what your FRIEND will do for you.

_________________
mpuaforum.proboards.com

Yep...more proof that shows that Arch has no idea of what he's talking about. She likes you so much that she'll jeopardize her career because it's all fun and games. "To hell with all of those years earning those degrees, Arch needs me to pose in my underwear on the internet."

_________________
mpuaforum.proboards.com

So long as they aren't nudes;)

I am glad other prominent members of this board are seeing into he fallacy of Arch's advice and how dangerous they can be when more impressionable minds follow. Can't say I am surprised that he posted a photo of a girl he alleges he's currently seeing. Most of this guy's posts are infused with mysoginist undertones, passive aggressive tactics, and follow an old school, Dog Training strategy to engaging with women. Its this very mentality that is off putting to any self-respecting person.

It's not hard to come up with an avatar/profile of the type of woman Arch would attract:
-young
-low self-esteem
-grew up in a dysfunctional family environment
-probably has addictive tendencies
-insecure attachment style (pursuers), sometimes pleaser types
-chronically self obsessed

Im not saying Arch is a bad guy, I can say however his advice profoundly demonstrates a lack of understanding of what a healthy relationship looks like. The posters 'RC' and 'Jackzero' for the most part offer a more power-with approach, and encourage the fostering of creating healthy, secure relationships - at least far closer to that then the majority of contributors on this board (mods included).

I get why Jack and RC are publicly calling you out. My initial reaction was "why go there? you just bought-into the dick measuring contest Arch was baiting you into", but I now realize its necessary to call someone out when they're peddling piss-poor advice.

Maybe a 20 y.o. who's head is up her own ass would do so to risk her job working the drive through window at mcdonalds. But a career woman jeopardizing her career to partake in having a photo taken whilst holding a sign for consumption on a pickup artist forum? I'm not saying women don't do stupid things, career women included...(I know of female psychologists who've had affairs with clients, were 'found out', and subsequently had their licensing indefinitely revoked), but the bar would be set pretty low to put yourself on public display for really no other 'pay off' than appeasing your douchey bf (which is why I'd question her mentality for getting involved with someone like this in the first place).

I have another theory on Arch's 'call-out'. Jack, could it be that Arch has a man-crush on you and is slowly but cleverly goading you into sending him some dick pics?

I seriously think that Arch is trying to create a character of himself and doesn't want to have to explain his "techniques" when they start to not make sense. Personally, I didn't want to go down the route of pics because it's tacky and isn't what the forum itself is about. However, Arch is going to ruin the forum by trying to "flex", as DA stated in a different post. I'm not in the business of using women to feed my ego, but I will shut down this silly picture thing because I'm willing to break my anonymity to guys on the forum that have proven to be trustworthy.

But he won't do it...because he can't.

_________________
mpuaforum.proboards.com

I can't be the one to have noticed that his entire persona revolves around one woman, or one specific type of woman.

You have no flexibility Arch. You claim abundance and then state monkey branching is a result of it. There's some fine irony in that.

Your entire self esteem is exactly that of a 40yo man dating a 20yo woman. Which in void is commendable, but in context it's your only sustenance. If this girl dumps you tomorrow you're simply a remnant.
And even that statement assumes she's actually your girlfriend.

That said, I agree with n2 that you're likely not a bad guy. But you're also not what you claim to be. This much ego is the resort of weak character.

Jack, neo, Dragula, these are people I've never doubted once. And they never had to show pictures for it.

_________________
I know my place. It's me on top of the world.

My in depth texting & dating guide.
There's no such thing as shit-tests.
How to keep a girl.

But career and personality DO matter for this kind of challenge. You're ok Arch, I just think youve dated a certain type of woman and let those women define your views. There are women you can tell hey lets make a sex tape on the first night, and they'll roll with that...and there are women who wouldnt. And the difference seldom has to do with which one is into you more or not. Different women are more likely to do something than others. A woman who is a model and has pictures online is more easy going to taking pictures for a forum than a woman who is more conservative. To say that how into you she is defines what she finds funny or not, is just ego. Same way in the other thread where the guy got a threesome and the other chicks bf was about to get a threesome. Had nothing to do with how into the guys the girls were, the girls were just fine with fucking each other and their bfs. Everyone has different levels of comfort with things. If you're saying that an underwear model being ok with taking an underwear pic for you = she's into you, vs another chick who that may not be her profession or tendency, that's just ego speaking. If you were dating a pornstar, and your challenge was who could get their girl to pose naked, can you not see how you'd be setting up a challenge where you have an advantage?

That woman is enormous, jack. A 4 at best. And still in a public place.

This page has been very telling. Posters are attacking young women as all "stupid" and investing huge paragraphs to attack me. There's an awful lot of over investment, likely caused by lack of action with attractive women.

Yet not a single one has posted a pic of a hot girl in their place.

....because there are no hot women in their place. They are armchair warriors.

_________________
Pickup coach. PM for direct, simple coaching.

Lol. Yeah right. You confuse having breasts with being huge. She is shaped like beyonce. If you want to call beyonce's shape a 4, then we have different tastes and that's cool. Just like I'm not attracted to a girl that would feel at home in the plumbing aisle.

Don't think it hasn't gone unnoticed that you're avoiding posing in a picture with you kissing your girlfriend. I have some with me kissing the girl in my pic.

Lmao...public place. At least I can prove that I'm in the same place with the girl in the pic.

_________________
mpuaforum.proboards.com

Jack, I had my half-naked gf taunt you twice in my place.

You have yet to show an attractive woman in a private environment.

_________________
Pickup coach. PM for direct, simple coaching.