Quote:
Women experience sexual attraction just like men do. And denying it won't change that. I'm not sure who taught you about women, but you're the type of guy that makes women not comfortable being sexually liberated. There's a reason that women aren't comfortable being sexual with a guy...it's because they are constantly judged.
Hahahha.. what the hell are you even on about? Just because women like sex, doesn’t mean they need to sleep with every guy they “sort of” like. Yeah buddy, let’s just have a society where everyone fucks everyone. Right in front of one another. That’s what you want? People can and should judge one another based on actions and words. Why wouldn’t they?
Quote:
I get it. You care if a girl thinks that you want to fuck her and you want guys to hide that. Me, I don't care if a girl knows. It doesn't mean that she can't enjoy herself around me if we're not having sex or I can't enjoy myself around women if I'm not having sex with them. However, I don't shy away from what I desire.
Want a round of applause or what? Again, there’s a LOT more to women than their “sexual bits”, and women who have anything going for them want to be appreciated for things other than their “sexual bits.” They also know that they can have sex with you – whether you are extremely upfront about it or reserve it a little bit. Again, there’s an order here that makes sense. And sexual stuff doesn’t come up first, unless you want to scare off all of the somewhat more conservative women out there, and not the ones that sleep around with everyone.
Quote:
No you don't have to be on the prowl for good/bad qualities. That's kind of stupid. Those things present themselves as they happen. No, you don't need to know what you're looking for in a woman before even bothering to meet them. You just have to be attracted to them and then get to know them. As you're getting to know them, you can figure out if they are worth having in your life.
What a load of crap. If you don’t know what you’re looking for you’re wasting your time. Unless you’re just thinking with your dick. Hello, Jack! You can figure this out both by meeting women like you said, yes, but also by actually figuring out what’s important to you from an opposite sex partner. Waiting for negative things to present themselves is just you wasting your time. Example… what if you don’t want to date a smoker? You end up going on 3 dates and then she whips out a cigarette – which is a deal breaker for you. You just wasted 3 nights, unless you just want to get your dick wet. This sounds like you, of course. Far better would have been to ask her around the 1st date or before that if she smokes and then just avoid dating her at all.
Quote:
You said "If the match is right and the chemistry is there, the sex will come naturally. "LMR" is something that won't exist". That's bullshit. Sex comes naturally with a lot of people who don't match as a couple.
I have this good friend and she went to Quebec a few months back. She is considered a "good girl" from most people's POV. Up until her visit she had only two sexual partners and they were both boyfriends. She met this French guy that was visiting Canada at a club and he spoke no English. She didn't speak any French, but they were having a good time dancing and it turned into kissing until it ended up back in her hotel room and they had sex. They weren't a match, they didn't get to know each other, there was just the mood. She said it was the best sex she had ever had up until that point.
I'm not sure what church you're going to when it comes to understanding women's sexual desires, but you have a habit of putting words into people's mouths that they haven't said. You've done it with Neo. You do it with me. I'm sure you're doing that with women now. If you knew women's sexual wants and desires...their thoughts are much more sexually liberated than men's. They will do things that most men won't imagine. They'll tell you about having a fantasy of having sex with a man that they don't know...hell, most women have a rape fantasy. This flowery, chastity belt wearing woman that you are portraying women to be isn't reality.
BTW...who says "macking" anymore?
Yawn… so this one girl had some lame boyfriends and needed a quick romp and got it – and it was great, and that means that as a whole, the less-intimate sex is better than more-intimate sex? Yeah, everyone is totally buying that.
“Most women have a rape fantasy” Source?
“They will do things that most men won't imagine.” Actually more women would rather have intercourse than give head. (CDC data). You just hang around with some really REALLY loose chicks, Jack.
Quote:
You don't have to have an emotional connection for intimacy. Drop that as an argument. If you have intimacy before the emotional connection, it doesn't mean that the emotional connection can't manifest afterwards.
Your entire explanation of how my advice can't lead to a relationship hasn't been explained. You just can't perceive or understand outside of your realm of experience. That's not unusual because you don't know what you don't know. Attraction, seduction, relationships do not have to be in a linear order. What you are advocating is considered societally acceptable but not mandatory and often doesn't work because it doesn't create a spark like the seduction we advocate here because our goal is to sweep a woman off of her feet. You can sweep a woman off of her feet, have sex with her the same day and in two or three months be in a monogamous relationship with her or have sex the same day and never see her again. You don't believe in keeping your options open with women, but I do.
I never said anything about intimacy and emotional connection being mutually inclusive or exclusive. These are partly related, but I never commented on their relationship. I only said that they are important in people developing a connection and becoming sexually uninhibited, ESPECIALLY women.
And your vague flirting bullshit isn’t going to be sweeping any women off of their feet. That’s for sure. Maybe I’m used to a different caliber of women than you are…
CHAT
