Quote:
I don't believe that having sisters helps you understand women better.
Who said it did? And why would you rely on your sister to understand women? That doesn't make sense.
Quote:
Maybe I would be better off if I viewed women merely as sexual creatures.
Merely? the hell are you talking about? Women are, highly at that, sexual creatures, but what do you mean "merely"?
And how is it that you view them now, anyway?
Quote:
I don't know how my sisters are of any benefit to me in any way??
Where do you get the idea that they should be? I really don't get it. Why do you believe the purpose of a sibling in life is to serve you, one way or another?
Quote:
When you have a clash with a member of the same sex, I think there's a some small level of respect, or the option for communication.
There's respect when you clash with someone you respect. Gender has nothing to do with it.
Quote:
It was actually from watching 'Two and a half men' (original series) that made me realise this. I just couldn't help but think about much more miserable Alan's life would be without Charlie in it (& vis versa). Alan has it tough, but at the end of the day, he's got someone he can confide in. I feel like they have the same problems as me in many ways... with women, with their mother - but the difference is they have each other.
That's just bullshit. First off, it's a show. You can't compare a show with reality.
Secondly, Alan is a failure portrayed through a comedic filter. Charlie is his polar opposite. He has neither 10% of his brothers money, charisma, charm, looks and the women Charlie brings home are the ones Alan barely even dreams of.
And he's reminded of that. Every. Single. Day. Now if this were real life, and not a soap opera, you tell me, do you still think it would be a blessing?