Quote:
As a side note, Im confused on something. Some times I see people here say if a girl cheats with you, as in cheats on her bf with you, doesn't mean she will cheat on you. But by this logic, doesnt that mean that if a girl cheats ON you, doesn't mean she will cheat again? I mean if the assumption is she cheats with you because you're a better guy than her bf hence it wont happen to you, then you can become a better guy and take back a girl who cheats on you. I don't agree with that, but just pointing out the flaw in logic when you say dont take back a cheater, but you can date a cheater. Maybe someone who believes that can explain the difference
The source of many confusion about ideas in general is the understanding that ideas work 100% in absolute terms. They don't.
Say, if the OP is married to his girl in a country where cheating is illegal, punishable by law with a prison sentence, it doesn't really follow that if OP sends her girl to prison, his girl would realize her mistake and change for the better once she is assimilated back into society.
In general terms, some criminals who got out of jail for parole due to good behavior will likely be repeat offenders while some would stay clean for long periods of time. This is the punishment side of learned behavior. Again, it isn't a 100% sure thing. Some would reform. Some wouldn't.
In the OP's case, it isn't as simple as that.
The girl got tired of the OP and tried out someone new who turned out to be better than the OP. The question is, how can the OP know, if he is to improve himself to get better so he can get back his girl, that the bar of getting better is reachable? To put that simply, which traits and qualities should he improve on so he does better in those areas compared with the competition?
That's a tall order. He can't just interview the guy or interview his girl to get an honest assessment on where he should improve on. This may take several years. In the meantime, the OP could have had moved on with his life and found other girls.
On the other hand, if another girl cheats with the OP considering the fact that she has an existing boyfriend, and realized that the OP is waaay much better than her boyfriend in so many aspects that she find attractive, then she is more likely to remain loyal unless she gets dissatisfied with the OP for say, the OP being too available, texting her everyday, acting more effeminate than a woman, and so on.
In the first instance, the girl knows that OP is worth losing due to dissatisfaction. In the second instance, the girl knows what she would lose if she gets caught cheating.
Moreover, in the first instance, the OP does not know the baseline in which to improve himself so he can exceed the bar of excellence from the competition and hence, get back his girl.
Knowing this, the OP should take an extreme effort to get really good at the bed department. 80% of women with male partners never had one vaginal orgasm via the penis in their entire life. So, if the OP learns to give a woman at least two vaginal orgasms through his penis, then he becomes a rare find. He not only sets himself apart from the 20% of men who can give women at least one vaginal orgasm through their penis but he sets himself at the top 1% who can give women more than one vaginal orgasm using his penis.
This makes it easier to tip the scales in OP's favor by improving his health, his source of income, his fashion sense and so on. But he can only learn to be good at the bed department by interacting with many other women.
It's a matter of betting your time and effort at the approach that will give you the best odds in your favor. In short, it is easier to turn a cheating woman who cheats with you into a loyal lifetime partner than it is to get back a cheating woman by improving yourself. The fear of loss pays greater dividends than getting back someone whom a girl decided to lose.
_________________
Approach. Open. Escalate. Isolate
Here are my two essential rules on texting that will save you tons of time and money:
general-questions/topic137931.html