Felt like putting down all the types of qualification cause thought it'd be helpful to quickly make a post of them. Also if alot of people haven't heard of these well now you know them n u can go look them up and you'd probably find them. Took me a year to discover all the types through learning in hs and applying the learning as time went on.
-Throughout the interaction qualification takes many different forms whenever you're interacting with women.

1. Pinging
2.Standards
3.Teasing
4.Compliance based
5.Sexual
6. Compliment based
7.Frame Controlling
8.Reverse

More Notes

-The other side of Qualification is Disqualification. You can use Disqualification to disqualify when she's not qualifying herself and disqualify yourself when she's attracted to you.
-if you're feeling that your qualification isn't taking when trying to qualify them based certain characteristics or qualities, try to use compliments as a motivator then use your qualification to explore whether or not she has those qualities. You can also use touch lke emphasis when asking her something to double or triple your compliance.

I promise u most of your questions either deal with qualification, getting polite response and not getting attraction, getting tripped up in one off interactions, or just simply not knowing the next step forward in your interaction is.

I think qualification is a conversational tool that makes interactions with women fun and full of emotions. Among many communication techniques, qualification is a good conversational filler to bait for touches from women and project a fun, playful, sexual vibe.

Sometimes, if you're not in the mood for talking, you can communicate caveman style. You can pull girls' hairs playfully without hurting them. Bump them with your ass and so on. Once you have affected girls into a playful mood, you can easily lick their earlobes without any issues on creepiness. It's all in the spirit of fun.

Likewise, girls who mirror (ping) back your caveman style of communication are not exactly qualifying themselves to you but you are setting up the stage for girls to qualify themselves to you. With play, you can set the stage for a teasing and fun banter that makes girls happily isolate with you with a qualification like:

"I'm betting my 100 bucks that you can't cook."

When in a playful mood, you can now isolate the girl to your apartment. Since you have been bumping assess, licking earlobes, and pulling hairs doggie style, you have already subtly started the foreplay.

Qualification without isolation is just mental masturbation. And a few guys on here who have already successfully isolated the girl are still trying to qualify the girl instead of moving forward with escalation towards the f-close.

Qualification is good. However, you need to proceed immediately to isolation to make it work. Otherwise, simply holding a girl's hand and eyefucking the shit out of her is way much better. When the 60 YoC escalation style so you can isolate the girl doesn't work though, you can always marinate girls in fun first through caveman style, qualify them, and then proceed to isolate.

_________________
Approach. Open. Escalate. Isolate

Here are my two essential rules on texting that will save you tons of time and money:

general-questions/topic137931.html

There's more to qualification than just establishing a fun playful vibe. It's the mechanism that moves you forward in the interaction. It gets girls invested, helps screen for sexual availability, IS ISOLATION, helps elimate flakes, etc. etc. It's one of the big picture skills it's tht important.

Caveman style establishes a fun, playful vibe. Qualification sets the frame that you're the PRIZE. Isolation is a compliance test to calibrate if the girl is ready for the f-close. It's like this:

Caveman (nonverbal) --> Qualification (verbal) --> Isolation (both verbal and nonverbal)

You've got the concepts mixed up OP.

Again. Qualification is one of the seducer's communication tools to set the frame that he is the prize. Moving things foward is mainly achieved through the nonverbals. Getting girls invested is achieved through compliance tests like penis-in-the-vagina or encouraging women to be generous with you.

I agree with you though that it is important. Provided, however, that you can use it to immediately isolate the girl. As a standalone verbal communication technique, it's as useless for a seducer as playing parlor games.

_________________
Approach. Open. Escalate. Isolate

Here are my two essential rules on texting that will save you tons of time and money:

general-questions/topic137931.html

You'd have to be more specific with cavemaning chicks. In what environment? I'm guessing you're speaking in a context such as a nightclub with beats n the bass blasting so loud u can hear the girl's heels clicking off the floor.

Everything else that u said yeah I agree about isolation its getting compliance. She moves with you, you're out of attraction and into comfort giving reasons u lke her,setting sexual frames, n baiting for sexuality. That's what Id do since I follow sinn's 1+1 model. If a girl is letting u do this n accept wht your doing actively your qualifying for physical compliance to see whether or not if she's comfortable with your advances

Everthing in terms in forms is up listed at the top.

University environment. Most of the time, some of us don't want to talk so caveman style is good for those who want to keep verbal communication to the very minimum.

_________________
Approach. Open. Escalate. Isolate

Here are my two essential rules on texting that will save you tons of time and money:

general-questions/topic137931.html

I've never really thought about it or tried to break it down like that.

For me, I just look at qualification as a product of your mindset. Once you have that you will naturally start to qualify girls all the way throughout the seduction in all of the ways that you've outlined.

I put it in the same category as all of the other techniques like challenging, demonstrating high value, creating rapport, leading ect that most guys try and then scratch their heads wondering why it isn't working for them. Not really realising that they don't have the correct understanding of the techniques and that they're not using them properly in the seduction. The techniques only account for a small percentage of your overall game. They're amazing tools that every good seducer should have in your arsenal, but you have to pull them off right and have them come from the right place for them to be effective.

For a guy with little experience it could be a little overwhelming to have all of this theory. But for a guy's who's had quite a lot of real life experience and kind of has the grip of things really breaking things down like this would add a professional edge to your game and maybe help you advance further and pull shit off that you never would of dreamed of before. Kind of like a golfer working on his swing, he knows that he can get the ball onto the green most of the time, but just adjusting the angle a little and hitting the ball with a little more swing in the right place might get him a little closer to that perfect shot.

Good for guys who are working on refinement of their techniques. I took a little from this as I'm currently going through the same process in honing a few of mine to make them more efficient.

Decent post.

Thanks man glad u appreciated it. Might add some more notes to this and draught down cause there's definitely a lot of stuff on qualification to add

Hey dasmooth, could you plz explain each type of qualification?? That would be awsome

Hey guys, been busy. Just a quick update on my life currently: finally finishing first semester of college, I'd be lying if I said I loved it, I don't lol. Thts why I'm going into trade to be an electrician . Thts wht my choice is standing as currently. The course and timespan for this is 18 months from wht I've found so by the end I would've been in college for 2 years with an associates degree , decent paying job, n not a ton of wasted years missing the best years of my life in my 20s. I'll be 21 by then so thts not tht bad.
Alright thts the end of my little update speel about myself n want to add more to this thread lke ive promised to do so but idk maybe I've also gotten lazy a bit to post too.

I'm going to explain these different types in the few upcoming days along with other good stuff u guys might lke relating to qualification n each type of, but ,just to make it clear, there's a lot stuff for each one. Lke idk if I should just give u the word for word definition explaining each individual type with some examples, or do tht but with my own interpretation of how I came to learn these n practiced these while I was in hs n out a lot with people I really got along with.
Id also to explain some advanced stuff in the near future with all this, but, to anyone who's new to this or is keeping up with my posts, I dnt want to overwhelm or end up confusing u . So instead I plan to small chunk n take it slow tht way u dnt get anything confused or any form of interference jumbling up with the stuff u may have learned or learning currently cause then you'll just forget n then tf the point, yaknow?

So to anyone reading this if u haven't seen the thread go back n read it or if u already read this but now you're just remembering tht u read this before maybe once, it might help to go back and read this thread again for a refresh. Ill be explaining each type as the days progress along with other stuff on qualification. plus the last 2 types tht I ddnt mention in the previous post. Again I'll try to small chunk if u know what I mean. If u have comments or questions dnt hesitate to post. Thanks guys

1. Pinging - pinging is just throwing it out there and seeing what comes back or what she gives back. You could think of it as lke a tiny test to see if she qualifies herself or reacts. Could be an observation about her , could be a bit of an unflattering statement to see if she fries to influence your opinion, could be a push back which could be the same as an unflattering statement depending on subtext n how you're phrasing what you're saying.

2. Standards- Yes or no questions or closed ended questions because your asking little questions or throwing out small qualifiers to where she's saying yes, no, or just a one worded response. Don't over think it if you're using standards and she's giving a more elaborative response with more emotional imput, thts fine. Reward her with a compliant(while framing) and transition in conversation with whatever it is you're talking about.

3. Teasing -After you've built enough investment to the point to where if you break rapport she'll chase tht investment. After you've hooked her or just her not wanting you to leave because hooking alone doesn't always necessarily mean she's attracted, but if you break rapport such as teasing for example, and she gives any of the basic IoIs you learn when you first start or learn body language/pickup like laughing, touching , playfully hitting you, qualifies herself to try and influence you to like her or like her more. There's value n she'll chase tht investment now because she values wht you think of her. You generated emotions or emotional stimulation, whatever u want to call it.
-if she doesn't do any of those things though , any negative response or expression, could be just her giving tht cold dead silence n her looking at you weirdly or angrily, means it didn't work. You gotta go backwards to build up tht level of compliance or stay where u are until you have a high enough level of compliance tht u can move forward. If she's doing tht she's giving disinterest to wht u said or possibly breaking rapport with you.
Wait for no pauses n transition with something else cause you cocky funny response,tease, or other breaking rapport technique you used ddnt work.
-if youre not good at teasing itself as a single technique you can tease then compliment n transition tht way you balanced both the tease n the compliment which both build compliance as passive acceptance of the frame if she doesn't reject or show disinterest. Then by transitioning thts more compliance n moving the conversation/interaction forward.

-both teasing and standards qualification demonstrate you are preselected n comfortable with women n yourself to where u can tease them. Qualification itself demonstrates that you chose women n others meet your standards instead of the other way around.
-you shouldn't open by teasing generally but if you do n she does any of the things I've said above there's already value there or a bit of attraction, you can move forward.
-teasing qualification is just a test to see if she values the investment she's built tht she'll chase it. If it doesn't keep building more investment n move forward.
If she's laughing or giving any of the IoIs I've mentioned above without the use of teasing qualification, you dnt need to tease. You could probably just move forward n use another form of qualification.

Some more notes and thoughts
- when in a 2 set trying to qualify there will always be the other girl who's the"non target" (if you're not gaming them both )the other one will try n throw u off because she she's you taking an active interest in her friend which makes her the odd one out if I'm trying to qualify her friend she'll try to get rid of me by dragging the girl away, throw me off by interrupting me /"shit " testing me or yaknow just making it hard by being a" bitch" .Thats why in two sets I'll qualify them both together or try to become friends with the targets friend, then I might have me n her friend try to joke around n tease her whether it's just an assumption of her being her little wing or pickup guys, basic cnf stuff that'll get her to push back against. A little bit of what Mystery would do.I'll use that sometimes or if its two girls in a mixed that since thts what it usually is, the mixed sets will become girl groups cause the guys just stand there and ask questions ,walk away when they get bored,or walk away anyway not noticing that one girl may have been interested but just walked away for whatever reason.