Quote:
Quote:
If there's a point you want to argue, lets hear it, and I'll give you 3 peer reviewed controlled studies to prove mine.
I think I already made the point quite clearly: arguments about differences between men and women based on evolution or biology should be regarded with severe skepticism. I'm not entirely sure what your point is though.
The arguments are based on lots and lots of controlled studies. The differences exist whether you acknowledge them or not. If there's a particular difference you want to debate, I'm ready to go at it, but as it is, I don't want to spend the night writing a 10 page treatise going over all of the difference between male and female brains/psychology. There's a lot of bullshit conjecture and speculation out there, sure, but it doesn't mean that there aren't huge differences that have been demonstrated beyond reasonable doubt. There actually is evidence that women prefer high test/masculine males for mating, and lower test males for provider roles. There's evidence at the fMRI level for humans serial monogamous nature. There's evidence for different patterns of promiscuity between males and females based on anatomy and controlled animal model behavior. Which points do you want to argue?