Completely forgot about this. I don't think I'll post the finished version though. It'll be my personal tool.
In any case, this isn't really an 'opener' as much an 'Opening routine'. In all actuality, it doesn't matter what you say as the opener, as long as it
A. Catches her attention
B. Sets the frame of the conversation desirably
C. Is Easily stackable/transitional
The whole point of this routine is to literally through script 'start' to fire off actions automatically(Kino, Attraction building, and Comfort building all from this opening routine). Like I said above anything can be used to start a conversation, such as 'Hi', but this is a routine that works as an opener and a followup. My finished version is a lot more of a checklist than a script however, and i've changed the context of the conversation slightly.
Quote:
my idea is that is really good to know and understand psychology but is never a good idea to discuss it with most of your targets, for many reasons, for example they feel attacked in their inside, they feel observed, they think the psychologist can't make them feel emotions because he only studies emotions, they feel psychologists are for people that are dead inside
This may be true, but psychology also associates you with Power, Value (It's a common belief that Psycologist are paid well as I've discovered), and a Man who potentially 'Gets it' -how a woman really works in terms of attraction. Really, you can work almost ANY career angle to show benefits. All in all, the whole point it to be Alpha. As long as YOU the pua is comfortable with what you're saying, it doesn't matter.
BTW, I always throw out a tester statement to determine whether to go Indirect or Direct when opening. If she's shooting IOIs the moment I talk to her, it'd be silly to waste time with indirect. It's all about calibration my friend, your end objective is sex either way.
Quote:
I don't like it. Indirect openers are supposed to be a little subliminal, yours is not. "What do you think of (insert your profession here)?" "Would you date one? I am one". This is basically how your opener came off to me. Don't get me wrong, I think the premise is a good one "would you date your psychologist?" But I think it actually works better if you don't mention you're going to be a psychologist. "The reason I'm asking is because a find of mine is in love with their psychologist and I think it's a bad idea for her to date him because blablabla"- I think this would be a better opener. I like to save the career aspirations talk until the first date anyways.
It really doesn't matter what you say. If you read, the whole point of mentioning that I myself wanted to be a psychologist or whatever profession before she gave her answer is to open an opportunity to neg her if she fails to give an IOI. (I.E 'Fuck you, Psychologist are awesome') and gain control of the frame from the get go. Add to the fact that you're already talking on a personal level rewards with some awesome Roleplaying time.
Also, i've used indirect hundreds of times and it doesn't matter if you say you it's happening to your friend or not, as long as you add a root and an FTC, the same effect comes across. In fact, I personally believe it's better to get your career out there asap if it's an interesting one because women always want to know that you are a man with a goal in life. A man that's going places. Combine this with talk about relationships(Emotional and Sexual-you can always bring it back up later in the conversation to escalate!) which women absolutely adore to talk about, and this may just be the most interesting Opener 'premise' in the world.
As I've said I've refined it quite a bit since the original post, but I'll leave the basic skeleton above and I encourage people to keep posting on how they would make it better in their own opinion.