Hey, I'm new here and was interested in outside opinions.

Call me old-fashioned, but the issue I have with online sarging is in order to find the hot ones, you have to sift through an enormous ocean of really ugly ones. Now you may say, "How does that differ from real life sarging", but I think it does. In my experience, doormen reject certain types of girls before they even get into the club and the exclusive clubs will only allow hot people and VIPs in.

I've also found that the real HBs on dating sites think they have an assumed value which is much higher than they're actually worth, due to the hordes of sad beta guys who shower them with compliments, hoping to win them over. This means HB6s and 7s suddenly start acting like HB8 or 9s because their online ego has been over-inflated. This is why I only dip into online dating almost as an after-thought and only sarge the hottest ones. I always imagine online girls are the ones who can't meet decent guys in real life, so (assuming they are not ugly) they probably date online because they have some other issue, such as social awkwardness / extreme shyness etc. I know some guys who swear by it and they keep boasting they have f-closed HB10s on there etc. I'm sure it's possible, but I just think sarging in the flesh gets quicker, faster and more reliable results than online.

Reasons why:

1) Typing is slower than talking

2) It's easier for the girl to flake online, simply by leaving the conversation, whereas in person you can control the exchange with body language.

3) Photos are often misleading (photoshopped, posed, hiding braces/acne etc.) so you waste time talking to less attractive women you would've already blown out in real life by now.

4) When I sarge, the key to my game is my voice, which I can't use online - (I'm a singer so I use my range to vary my pitch depending on the stage of attraction / seduction)

5) It's very time-consuming and the rewards don't seem worth the time when compared to the success you can have with real-life sarging.

Am I just a tight-fisted dinosaur unwilling to pay for an iPad?

AFC Hunter Foxe

.

You're definitely right about online girls thinking they are hotter/better than they are. They actually did a study and found that something like 70% of women feel they are better than the men they find online, whereas only 40% of men feel that way.

I've had epileptics and girls in wheelchairs reject me before, it's insane. And the hotties, well their inboxes are so full that they miss out on half the decent guys just because they have to spend time deleting and sifting through 50 y/o losers who contact them with "Hey baby, your hot." That's why AFCs screw up the online thing for everyone because they muddy the waters by splashing around and scaring away the good fish.

_________________
“Nothing is impossible, the word itself says 'I'm possible'!” ~Audrey Hepburn

There's some truth to what you say, BUT... There are some exceptions to your assumptions.
Yes, but you also get to ensure with 100% accuracy that what you wish to say is said properly. You can take as much time as you would like preparing to make a statement which will have the most impact, rather than whatever comes off the tip of your tongue. Of course, people with good charisma/public speaking skills can mitigate this disadvantage of personal interaction and actually use it to their advantage, but it goes the other way around. I type 120 words per minute. I have no problem thinking AND getting a quick response out there.
True. But it's also easier for you to pull a dozen girls in 1 week and only keep the cream of the crop. If one girl flakes, you can have a dozen others lined up. This is harder (although possible) to achieve in clubs/bars. You have to dedicate 100% of your attention to a HB for the duration of your interaction. Online, you can divide your time between as many girls as you can keep up with.
Photoshopping isn't that common. But posing/hiding braces/acne/being out of shape is pretty common. You can mitigate this by asking for pictures through text messages which are (presumably) taken on the fly. Also, some people are just not photogenic but they ARE attractive.
I agree with this.. And also the comment you made about being able to control the interaction better. I can easily walk up to 10's in clubs/bars, open, keep their attention, and win them over through wit/charm and walk away with at the very least a phone #. Online, girls judge by: Picture, Height, -----tons of other stupid factors ---> profile last.

It takes a REALLY good profile to win a girl over if she wasn't impressed by your Picture/Physical stats right away. Fortunately, I write really good profiles.


See above. It's also only as time consuming as you make it.

What happens if you're not into clubs and bars? Where else am I supposed to meet girls now that im not in college anymore?

Supermarkets, sporting events, redlights, courthouses, coffee shops, any kind of class you can think of, the gym, the park, a concert, walking down the street, the gas station, online, on the bus. Anyway, I could go on all day long with where to meet women other then the bar/club scene. I think you get the point though.