Quote:
Its great to see others responses...of course some agree and others dont..
To start, my roommate didn't lie to me..these are things I observed (He is dating a model now). And things he told me about him and other players..
Everyone knows u have to be challenging,mysterious, unpredictable..but its not easy to be those without some manipulation..I used to be a sexually confident guy who lets women know what I want..But truth is, then u r not a challenge anymore..or unpredictable..
I can give u a real example: Assume a newbie PUA gets a woman's number. He is throwing a party..he calls her and says "I have a party tomorrow..u should come" or some variation of that..And if she comes, he will talk to her confidently and build rapport..
A player does not do that. He calls her DURING the party and says " Hey I just remembered u, when I saw ur number..stop by if u r free"..and when she turns up, he totally ignores her during the party and flirts with other women..
Now that looks like harmless stuff but its mind fucking. Its manipulation. There are various levels of it a player/natural uses at various times. There are so many subtle tricks. Now the first approach (which is taught by PUAs these days) can work but does not fly well as the second one. The second one is extremely effective.
So this is what I meant when I said u have to be a bit manipulative. Like old age PUA methods. Newbies are too direct and straightforward in their approach. They are never the challenge or the prize. Again to repeat last post, u dont need to give a woman an emotional rollercoaster but the significance of some sort of game is undeniable.
I have this two questions that pops out in my mind constantly when i read about being "manipulative". Do i care? and Does it work?
I like your post, recently i have found a very one sided opinion in this forum about how to game. Being manipulative BAD, being direct GOOD wich maybe right and maybe wrong is kind of dissapointing the lack of conflict (im not saying it is always like that).
When someone ask for puas like mystery or similar and get the "mystery FB" label on them. Sometimes is true, sometimes its not but i always hear the "i dont want to be manipulative" answer pretty often.
But my two cents on the subject is the this: the "Manipulative" label has layers its not black and white. And on the black and white thingie i may add that a big part of that "manipulative" label comes from moral opinion. Lets be honest, i honestly doubt the mayority of people learning pua aspire to become for the sake of being moral paragons.
More than asking or saying "being manipulative its bad" or "its not being true with yourself" or "its ok, to be manipulative?"
One should ask question like "Does is work being manipulative?" "how does it work?" "how do i learn to be manipulative?"
To me is like some pua theory became like Karate instead of "CQC". In karate isntead of teaching just how to kick people they teach you a way of thinking and a moral standpoint, instead in CQC they just teach you how to kick people, PUA should by my deffinition only teach you how to pick up. Things like whats right and wrong to do while picking up is left for your own morality to consider. You want to learn pua to fuck women and dont care for their well being? Cool, thats your choice learn the trade and be happy! Want to learn pua to cultivate wonderfull relationships and make the life of the woman you meet better that before? Thats cool too! learn the trade and be happy!
Would i lie to a woman to fuck her? All the time. Its being manipulative? yes. Im a bad person for doing it? No, im bad person for a lot of other motives
Just my opinion anyway