You've got Ross Jeffries suggesting that PUA is about hypno, NLP style gaming.

Then you've got Mystery stating : "you must first disqualify yourself from being considered a potential suitor by her. if you don't do that, she will assume by your approach alone that you're after her. And if you're after her, she knows that you percieve her as having high value"(The Mystery Method, pg. 5)

But hold on, wait a minute, you've then got Alan Roger Curie claiming that 'Mode One' behaviour is the secret, a complete contrast to Mystery's belief. With a theory that you should tell women immediately that you think they're hot etc.

Then you've got Kezia Noble, who's writen a book which is basically just a guide for social retards to improve their self worth.

Afraid I'm just a bit confused and need some clarity, need to question: What is the PUA thing all about? What's the right style if they're frequently so retarded or conflicting in opinions?? Which Master PUA is most real, who's fake and making money for nothing?

Mate, you should know that not every school of thought suits every man. I'm quite energetic and humorous, so David deAngelo's stuff suits me, and i like dressing in funny and eye-catching clothes like t-shirts with complicated patterns and funny graphics, and my trademark red and black desert scarf, and having my hair madly spiked, so a lot of Mystery's shit on outer game works well for me too, just not over-doing it. Then when it comes to attraction, Gambler's shit has really helped me. There is no be-all and end-all of PUA, there are many different methods for those who are systematic or unorganized, humorous or serious. You can't learn all of the PUA knowledge in the world from one person, you have to mix it up, or find a method that works for you (or even make your own!) and get really really really good at it. It's like trying on shoes man, not all of them are gonna fit ya.
My two cents.

every school of thought has its pros and cons , its your job to study them and use what you learn to adapt your style so that it works.

for instance if the routines in mystery method isnt workign for you but the kiss close is then just drop the routines.

it doesnt have to be all or noithing with them mate

_________________
Seize the day

Whichever bits and pieces are the most congruent with the type of personality you ideally want to portray to others (i.e. most congruent with your "best self")

No one method is complete in and of itself for every situation and any guy.

Indirect game can work well in a high end club situation, whereas mode one is great for daygame. Mode one can lead to problems in a tight-nit small social group, and indirect game during the day is a waste of time and can seem fake.

A guy who's naturally chatty and funny can use that to engage her with stories and build solid rapport and comfort, whereas a naturally silent guy can use more aggressive sexual escalation game where he doesn't need to say much.

There is no "right" or "wrong," there are a collection of general behaviours - confidence, social intelligence, knowing how to escalate, that are required for all of them, but the system is mainly whatever you feel is right for you. Over time, picking elements of all the different ones and patching them together will create a method that is completely personal to you, and therefore the most congruent with who you are.

_________________
SEX Technique Material http://bit.ly/iFdky0

FREE PDF w Openers, Date ideas and Videos on Direct: http://www.sashapua.com

Thanks for the opinions guys.

For me personally I'll stick to Mode One as this is the simplist and most conducive to me. As Blondeguy suggested, some other snippets of info have been useful though, like the K close triangle stare that I didn't know about, and little games like The Cube to make conversations for the women more emotionally stimulating.

Guess it's all about the practice. One thing that I've definately changed in my behaviour is to care less and less about one particular womens responses. It's all good self improvement stuff.

Keep gaming