Quote:
Yea, tbh i was a fan of SS before seeing this but am a bit despondent on it now.
Dont take that the wrong way, im sure it works, im just not sure its for me, but i think it could work amazingly in the closing phases
For exampled, the one chick outside the club started talking about how she went to a strip club and was pretty much ON you. If you had steered the convo more cocky funny, playful at that point i think you could well have got laid.
Keep it goin tho dude, look forward to seeing you develop
I memorized a ton of C&F lines and there's rarely ever an opportunity for me to utilize them, but when there is an opportunity, you bet, I sure will use cocky funny too. Remember, in the Best Buy sarge where I used cocky funny and said, "Are you trying to win me over?" When the chick was like guessing my age and told me she thought I was younger??? I reframed it into her giving me a compliment, and then reframed it again into her trying to win me over (which is one of the cocky funny frames).
The only problem I have with cocky funny is that it's not as predictable (at least from my experience trying to use it) as say, challenging her then going into a seduction question...like, in the latter, I KNOW for sure what I'm about to do...there's no question in my mind that this is what we're going to talk about. Whereas, when I try to use cocky funny on the fly, it seems like..I have to rely on her to do or say something with which I have a C&F comeback line prepared.
On the other hand, some Speed Seduction patterns do contain cocky funny (teasing, banter, whatever you want to call it). For example, the Snack Quiz contains a false disqualification when you playfully tease her for guessing the wrong snack on the first try. I'll say something like, "Oh..sorry, I like X better, but that's okay, don't worry, you still have 2 more chances" (frame is set utilizing a tease to mask it--also known as cocky funny).
Speed Seduction 3.0 contains other such games/quizzes which are more playful and fun rather than deep and intense. It's just so happens, with me, I'm the type of person who seems to like the intense patterns better. It's easier for me to do them. Like, Love Systems said in their Routines Manual Volume 2, some guys are better at state-based game (teasing/banter/BT spikes) and some guys are better at intrigue-based game (patterns, cold reads, insight) then, there are some guys who can do both well. I am naturally good at creating intrigue and I'm also going to work on my state-based game as well.