The Truth about "Cardio"...Screw Cardio



Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests
Post new topic Reply to topic   Board index » Related Areas & Misc » Health & Fitness




Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 29, 2009 8:20 pm 
Offline
MPUA Forum Addict

Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2009 4:02 am
Posts: 261
Website: http://www.youtube.com/SOULFIGHT
AOL: RedDeliciousSOUL
Location: New York City
WHoever says Cardio is useless must either be really skinny or really fat, but the page isn't quite loading for me.

Cardio's extremely important and if you don't agree, you must be new. It's especially important if you're training for aesthetics and more important if you're trianing for performance.

Sure, long slow distance burns fat and may break down muscle - but that's what sprints are for! Burn that fat, build that muscle. It's just too hard on your body to do it too often, so I mix it up. 2x a week Long, 2x a week Sprint, other stuff on other days.

_________________
Image
Check out my blog: GDBCrew.com http://gdbcrew.com
Always down to sarge in NYC - Holla at me


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 31, 2009 2:30 pm 
Offline
Member of MPUA Forum
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 20, 2009 10:41 am
Posts: 184
I got a little off topic in my post but everything I said was fact. Look it up.[/quote]

You should be giving us YOUR facts :wink:


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Aug 02, 2009 12:02 pm 
Offline
New to MPUA Forum

Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 12:03 pm
Posts: 9
The title made me lol hard - stupidest proposition ever.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Aug 02, 2009 5:04 pm 
Offline
New to MPUA Forum
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 23, 2009 12:51 am
Posts: 22
Website: http://vonbergdesign.blogspot.com
Location: Montreal, Canada
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Stop doing cardio and see how fast you gain the weight back. Cardio does nothing to change your bodies composition. Look at the greek runners who ran the first marathon they died, so did the father of modern running some dumbass who tried to copy their 165 miles in a day runs. He died 30 minutes after completing the run. Aerobics has wreck more knees, hips, ankles and backs than anything anaeorbic its not just counter productive its dangerous. Stretching is also dangerous btw look at all the baseball players with the hip injuries this year, thats from having their trainers stretch them out like Brad Pitts character in that movie "Burn After Reading" did to that one client who heard the pop.

Quote:
I got a little off topic in my post but everything I said was fact. Look it up.


ok i looked it up. i don't know where to start...
..okay! first of all, just over do anything and you'll use part of your body of course (construction guys have back problems. computer poeple having wrist problems. artist having fingers arthirt problem and it go on.) so of course runners don't escape that and they can harm themselves by doing sum over trainning in order to get to their performance goals. it happens its their choice.
overdoing stretching is dangerous you are right. o wait i said OVER stratching right... not doing stretching at all will first limit your natural range of muscle as you get older and it has been proven taht a good stratching plan is helping the apparence of the muscle soz the muscle acid/blood stream system.

i know people can harm themselves easly. i am at my job at the moment (shit ass long day, its rainy, anyways!) which is a gym. i look at people runing on the treadmill right now: 3 lady walking for the past 2 hours: no results and the one's running's running way too fast and not properly. ill go tell 'em but this is way common situation.

that's my point on that.

_________________
Girls just plays groupies, so i gotta play rockstar.

-Some guy named Mystery


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Aug 03, 2009 4:47 pm 
Offline
New to MPUA Forum

Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2008 11:13 am
Posts: 2
Do you HIIT cardio , people!!


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Aug 03, 2009 10:22 pm 
Offline
MPUA Forum Zealot
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 04, 2007 7:02 am
Posts: 490
Location: Ohio
Quote:
The title made me lol hard - stupidest proposition ever.
Seriously haha. This could be the most idiotic debate I have ever read. Cardio has no benefits? Really? If that's what you think I'm not even going to argue because if you seriously think cardio is crap then you must be stubborn and won't believe anything any of us say so I won't bother. Anyone who argues against it probably has never really dedicated themselves to exercise and knows nothing.

And that's that.

_________________
-Bedrock

"The society that separates scholars from its warriors will have its thinking done by cowards and its fighting done by fools." - Thucydides

Seize the day with love

Sometimes you succeed, and sometimes you learn.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 04, 2009 3:16 am 
Offline
New to MPUA Forum
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 23, 2009 12:51 am
Posts: 22
Website: http://vonbergdesign.blogspot.com
Location: Montreal, Canada
Quote:
Anyone who argues against it probably has never really dedicated themselves to exercise and knows nothing.
second that.

_________________
Girls just plays groupies, so i gotta play rockstar.

-Some guy named Mystery


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 04, 2009 10:38 am 
Offline
Member of MPUA Forum
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 20, 2009 10:41 am
Posts: 184
Quote:
Quote:
Anyone who argues against it probably has never really dedicated themselves to exercise and knows nothing.
second that.
Thirded.

Because it needs done


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 1:36 am 
Offline
Member of MPUA Forum
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 4:33 pm
Posts: 184
Location: Montreal, Quebec
The Body by Science book is very interesting. There's a recurring theme in it: pre-selection. Most people seem to agree that cardio helps to raise metabolic rates, however this book suggests that it is in fact the other way around, that is, people with high metabolisms move a lot more.

I'm thoroughly perplexed by the argument. Based on RVAIS' testimonial, I'm inclined to think that there must be something to the theory.

In fact, the book speaks to how steady-state exercise can actually contribute to muscle loss. This theory also makes some sense to me, although I'm not entirely convinced just yet.

It does seem as though non-steady-state cardio may or may not help, but would not hurt. Is this a fair assessment?


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 8:32 am 
Offline
Member of MPUA Forum

Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2009 10:54 pm
Posts: 181
I didn't read the full blog of this but I've gone through the same thing. I used to alternate between the cross trainer, biking, and running for one hour every day, 7 day's a week.
And I saw no results whatsoever.
You need to have a good diet, and by that I mean metabolism aswell. I've got a few friends with high metabolism and they eat all types of fast food every day and they are skinny as shiit and do no workouts at all (they are not muscular though).
I used to eat like 3 big meals a day, now I'm eating more meals a deal at a smaller portion because I read that is how higher metabolism can be achieved?

Anyways I'm not sure the whole point of that blog because I didn't read it all but I thought I'd put up my own thoughts/experience on the subject...


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 11:51 am 
Offline
New to MPUA Forum

Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 11:20 am
Posts: 14
Location: Paramus, NJ
Isn't weight loss/fat loss all about creating a deficit between the calories you take in and the total calories you need to maintain your current weight? Cardio is one way to create the deficit, and dieting another. They work best in conjunction (I've lost about 30 lbs in under three months by cutting down on what I eat and running on the treadmill for 2-3 miles each day) but yeah, obviously if you gorge yourself on high calorie foods after your workout, it isn't going to do much for you.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 4:03 pm 
Offline
New to MPUA Forum

Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 11:00 am
Posts: 11
I'm a third year medical student, and I'm quite active in sports and at a local gym.

As for as loosing weight goes, Cardio isn't great. It's not bad, and in most cases its better than nothing. The reason why it isn't as great as people think is as follows:

Cardio consumes energy (glucose, glycogen and fat) in order to move. It tries to do this as efficiently as possible. A result of lots of cardio excecise is a loss in muscle mass. Look at the marathon runners. How many bulky guys do you see? None.

The muscle loss is detrimental to loosing fat (notice I didn't say weight) however, because muscles increase metabolism. More muscles = higher resting energy consumption. I read somewhere that 1 pound of muscle consumes an extra 50 cals per day.

So weight lifting (which adds muscle) is much better than cardio because it
a) burns fat
b) GAINS muscle

compared to cardio which
a) burns fat
b) LOSES muscle.

I can go into more detail, but that is quite frankly irrelevant. Cardio is good for loosing weight, weights/HIT is (much) better.

Yours,

Nim


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 10:02 pm 
Offline
Member of MPUA Forum
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 4:33 pm
Posts: 184
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Nim,

Thanks so much for clearing that up.

Reading into what you're saying then, cardio does help to lose weight, but some of that weight will be muscle weight, and muscle helps you to lose fat. Cardio seems like a short-sided weight loss solution--or have I completely missed what you're saying?

Jpow


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 28 posts ] 

All times are UTC


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron

Can we be honest?

We want your email address. Let me send you the best seduction techniques ever devised... because they are really good.
close-link