Chatting to an HB8 - we have good rapport going, some light kino. She mentions her bf, so I go for a basic destroyer routine: 'He sounds like a great guy, you two sound perfect for each other. You'll be married next year, then you'll soon have a couple of kids and a white picket fence...'.

At which point she turns to me and playfully goes: "NOOOOO!! Stop it!! What are you trying to do?? Break us up??

She then changes the topic and we keep chatting...

Has this happened to anyone before? And what do I do now...

haha you just caught her off gaurd so she really didn't know what to say. From here this is what I woudl typically do... if she tries to be too playful or always want to hang out tell her she needs to invest more in her bf than you. Always worked for me, but the only time I DONT do that is when I know she has good looking single friends. I just stay friendly with her and end up having her introduce me to them. They see their taken friend having a good time with you they'll see their single selves having an even better time with you.

lmao

this means its a good bf destroyer routine

it never happened to me before, so cant help you with it

As far as I can see, it worked fine...

_________________
"Love is three quarters curiosity." ~Casanova
Hominem Unius Libri Timeo



Diploma in Clinical Hypnosis -- GHR & NHS

Id say this line,,,

"NOOOOO!! Stop it!! What are you trying to do?? Break us up?? "


is kind of an IOI... right??

_________________
".. I will learn all that I've forgotten, I will succeed where I'd previously failed, and even if I don't I wont stop, cuz this is not just about girls, this is about Life "

i respectfully disagree.

leave the boyfriend out of conversation completely. make her completely forget about him and let her see how fun and interesting and how much better you are than him. as long as the conversation is about the boyfriend, she will be thinking about him and not you, which is a dlv and counter productive. move on with regular game and dont bring him up. if the boyfriend gets brought up again, use a different, possibly more harsh boyfriend destroyer (search 'boyfriend destroyer' and there are plenty to choose from), and move on with more game.

ps: in your situation this sounds like a shit test to me, in which case bringing the boyfriend will probably make you fail the shit test.

Thanks for all the thoughts guys.

Hucker, I'm just a little confused as to what you are saying. You say move on with regular game and need a more harsh bf destroyer if necessary, but then you say it sounds like a shit-test and I shouldn't bring up the bf. I don't quite understand, could you clarify? And what is the best way to pass this shit-test - I haven't come across this one before.

Cheers!

hes trying to say that if you see a cockroach you smash it with your foot ( Bf destroyer line), and if the damn roach shows up again, you bring out a flame thrower and burn the damn thing ( a more harsh BF destroyer line )

THe BF must be out of the convo at all times, thats tru, if the BF is brought up into the convo, try another BF destroyer line... then after a while if thee BF is brough up into the convo,again.... then use a more harsh BF destroyer line..

Meaning that only if necessary youll have to use the BF destroyer stuff, other wise you can game her as you would a single girl.

RIght HUcker??

_________________
".. I will learn all that I've forgotten, I will succeed where I'd previously failed, and even if I don't I wont stop, cuz this is not just about girls, this is about Life "

That's the opposite of the issue that I had, when gaming a hb9. She mentioned the BF (although they are only casually dating)

and I said

Me: He sounds like a really NICE, SAFE guy who will buy you flowers every day.

she replied

HB9: My Kind of guy

---------

We all know, that chicks don't know what they're attracted to. And she thinks she's attracted to that afc kind of behavior. so ultimately the BF. Destroyer failed.

I think in both cases, it just caught them off gaurd, and for some reason or another, just didn't register..

At any rate, any ideas how to respond to above statement?