Unanswered topics | Active topics |
New posts | Your posts
| Author | Message |
| FNB | PostPosted: Wed Dec 31, 2008 4:19 pm | |
| Offline | | MPUA Forum Enthusiast |
Joined: Sun Nov 16, 2008 3:40 pm
Posts: 87 | | We had just a discussion here at Natural Game about what is the difference between a natural and an AFC. I would say that there is an enormous difference between a natural that is naturally good with women and an AFC that has no skills at all with women as he has never got any experience. I would now continue on that interesting dicussion by asking what is then the difference between a natural and an alpha male? Both are themselves and can get girls attracted to them easily.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
| Kalel | PostPosted: Sun Jan 18, 2009 8:15 am | |
| Offline | | PUA Forum Leader |  |
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2008 3:30 am
Posts: 810 | | I assume when we say alphas, we mean natural Amogs and not puas who use alpha techniques.
I would also argue that Amogs are a type or subset of naturals. They are naturals that have learned to use their physical and social attributes to enhance their ability to attract women.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
CHAT