Women are NOT "sets"



Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests
Post new topic Reply to topic   Board index » Tools & Techniques of Game: Meeting, Attracting and Seducing Women » Approaching and Opening




Author Message
 Post subject: Women are NOT "sets"
PostPosted: Fri Dec 26, 2008 6:06 am 
Offline
New to MPUA Forum

Joined: Fri Dec 26, 2008 5:16 am
Posts: 15
Why must you call women "sets"? Come on, think about it. Women are PEOPLE. You are a person, i am a person, why should you use freakin TERMS for females? Would you call your mom and Her Friend a fuckin "2 set?" or would you like some creep afc calling YOUR mom "target" or a "set" This Mystery / Strauss shit is getting screwed up, its enough they have about a million guys confused as hell using their programs and getting stuck left and right...and not having hardly ANY success. AND their STILL MAKING FUCKIN PRODUCTS. Even David deangelo has Mystery explaining:: "in order to attract a woman, it takes roughly 7 hours, in which you must show that you are a leader, have high value, and a protector, attraction, comfort phase , seduction" complete Retardation.

And David Deangelo is just as bad for having him on almost all of his DVD'S. Im just trying to get my point across. Lets be more natural about this.[/b]


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Dec 26, 2008 2:20 pm 
Offline
Post of the month winner!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 5:53 am
Posts: 3102
Not really sure why you're so angry over some lingo but . . .

What type of industry are you in? I am quite sure that no matter which type of industry you're in, you'll have to deal with some sort of lingo in order to BE MORE SPECIFIC while reducing CLUTTER and avoiding REDUNDANCY.

That's the point. Here are some examples:

Medical:
http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.h ... A9679C8B63

Marketing:
http://www.emergemarketing.com/publicat ... _lingo.htm

Many, many more but you get the idea.

And I would never call your mom a "target" unless you show us some pictures of her and she's no older than 50. OK, OK . . . I'm kidding. Uhm . . . is she 48?


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Dec 26, 2008 3:40 pm 
Offline
MPUA Forum Enthusiast

Joined: Sun Oct 19, 2008 6:39 pm
Posts: 75
Don't get angry over this its really not a big deal.I think all the drunk AFC'S out there not involved in pick-up refer to a group of women, lets say using worse terms.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Dec 26, 2008 3:41 pm 
Offline
Mr. Nemo

Joined: Sun May 18, 2008 8:18 am
Posts: 3102
Location: OC, California
Quote:
Not really sure why you're so angry over some lingo but . . .
Agreed.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Dec 26, 2008 3:55 pm 
Offline
PUA Forum Leader
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2008 10:19 am
Posts: 1688
Location: UK
I could say "I approached a group with 2 women and 1 man" or "I approached a mixed 3 set". It saves time and why say group instead of set it makes no difference.

Also as far disagreeing with things mpuas say, can I just ask how much time you have spent studying these things? There is a reason those guys are household names, actually commit, learn and practice their teachings and you will do a hell of a lot better than you would without them.

_________________
Troll the trolls
free book http://www.4shared.com/file/123140320/b ... ndows.html


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Dec 26, 2008 5:08 pm 
Offline
MPUA Forum Enthusiast

Joined: Sun Nov 16, 2008 3:40 pm
Posts: 87
A so called "Set" can consist of both women and men and so be a so called mixed set. In that way you can also be inside a set. It really hasn't got anything to do with gender. You don't seem to like PUA jargon but like "kasabi" wrote above jargons are also used in medicine and marketing and you don't "hate" that. Do you?

I personally don't use any PUA lines, disqualifiers, FTCs, negs or C&F. The last two possibly when I playfully tease girls I like. I just be myself and girls seem to like me. I get 9s and 10s by just being myself. I have never understood why to use PU lines when you say what ever, hotties and models are not "bitchy" towards me so why use negs when they want to speek to you. Why use disqualifiers when you can get pretty much any girl and girls can see it the same way as guys can see that a 10 can get pretty much any guy she wants. I do myself speak for a REAL natural game so I agree with you that "lets be more natural about this".

Why are you so angry against Erik von Markovik and the cool "nerd" Neil Strauss? They have their own ways to attract and seduce women. I use some of their stuff and disagree completly with somethings in the Venusian arts like negs, FTCs or disqualifiers. In other words it doesn't mean that you have to follow them.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Dec 26, 2008 7:02 pm 
Offline
Dedicated Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2008 10:11 pm
Posts: 607
Location: UK
It's just jargon. In poker it's easier to say "the flop" rather than "the first 3 community cards which apply to everyone on the table".
Also it's handy when being "out in field" because for instance say you have allot of experience and you're trying to help a new guy get over his "AA", saying "Go approach that 2 set" sounds better to the other people standing around them (many of whom couldn't be future targets, oh sorry "people he would like to have sexual and emotional relations with over an undetermined amount of time") rather than saying to him "Go approach that group of girls over there" the reason that sounds worse is because it makes him appear socially inept because they now know his buddy is having to talk him into approaching girls.
I hear much worse things said by men around clubs and pubs, "bitches, slags/sluts, pussy" just to name a few.
Also as already stated saying "2 set" does not neccersarily mean 2 women. Set is used in the context of "a set of people", if I was talking to 2 random guys on a night out and I was to write about that whole night out the next day I would write "talking to a male 2 set".

At the end of the day dude, there are bigger things in the world to worry about than a few words which do no harm to anyone. I don't like having a go at people but your post just showed the same kind of prejudice that this community always gets, why do you think so many people in this community choose not to mention it to friends and family (not referring to myself there btw).

_________________
"My toughest opponent is always myself"
Musterion's Journal


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Dec 26, 2008 10:58 pm 
Offline
PUA Forum Leader

Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2008 9:05 pm
Posts: 835
PLAH. Not a good thread.

_________________
V1V :twisted:


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Dec 26, 2008 11:56 pm 
Offline
MPUA Forum Addict

Joined: Sat Nov 15, 2008 6:06 pm
Posts: 253
Location: D.C.
Quote:
PLAH. Not a good thread.
agreed


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Dec 27, 2008 6:57 am 
Offline
MPUA Forum Enthusiast

Joined: Sun Nov 16, 2008 6:36 pm
Posts: 57
With the proper wording, even jesus! seems like a bad thing.

_________________
Tyler Durden: F off with your sofa units and strine green stripe patterns, I say never be complete, I say stop being perfect, I say let... lets evolve, let the chips fall where they may.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Dec 27, 2008 7:40 am 
Offline
New to MPUA Forum

Joined: Fri Nov 28, 2008 2:44 am
Posts: 18
Mystery refers to any people as sets. If you watch the videos of some of his seminars he explains to the guys in the room that they are actually an 18 set or however many there are. The "target" is easier than saying "the girl I would like to attract". Picking out a girl you want is something all guys do, PUA or not. Where is your validation for saying that it is unsuccessful and furthermore that if in any single case it is unsuccessful then is it because the individuals failure to do it properly or because the system's failure?

Basically to sum up your post: "I'M ANGRY BECAUSE OTHER PEOPLE ARE STUPID AND I WOULD LIKE TO DEMONIZE THE COMMUNITY BECAUSE OF SEMANTICS."

Did you mum get picked up for real or something?


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Dec 27, 2008 4:17 pm 
Offline
MPUA Forum Zealot
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 16, 2008 2:55 am
Posts: 337
hey, no reason to insult the guy

_________________
Slept On Rappers
http://hiphoprising.blogspot.com


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: Women are NOT "sets"
PostPosted: Sat Dec 27, 2008 6:44 pm 
Offline
PUA Forum Leader
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2007 7:00 am
Posts: 1621
AOL: latergator83
Location: NE
Quote:
Why must you call women "sets"? Come on, think about it. Women are PEOPLE. You are a person, i am a person, why should you use freakin TERMS for females? Would you call your mom and Her Friend a fuckin "2 set?" or would you like some creep afc calling YOUR mom "target" or a "set" This Mystery / Strauss shit is getting screwed up, its enough they have about a million guys confused as hell using their programs and getting stuck left and right...and not having hardly ANY success. AND their STILL MAKING FUCKIN PRODUCTS. Even David deangelo has Mystery explaining:: "in order to attract a woman, it takes roughly 7 hours, in which you must show that you are a leader, have high value, and a protector, attraction, comfort phase , seduction" complete Retardation.

And David Deangelo is just as bad for having him on almost all of his DVD'S. Im just trying to get my point across. Lets be more natural about this.[/b]
Calm yourself young grasshopper. A set is just a synonym in PUA for "one or more strangers". When you succeed in opening and hooking the set, they become friends or lovers. When you fail, they remain strangers and sets. Easy enough?

_________________
afc-challenge-to-the-masters-social-anx ... 10108.html


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Dec 27, 2008 8:40 pm 
Offline
Dedicated Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2008 3:12 pm
Posts: 677
Website: http://freepua.tk
Location: England
You need to get laid (by a chick)


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Dec 27, 2008 10:01 pm 
Offline
MPUA Forum Addict

Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2008 10:19 pm
Posts: 249
Livinitup, I think you just might be creating tension. lol you sure got some responses. I did a little research, and your views are alot like Cory Skyy. In fact, he says almost EXactly what you say in your post. It kinda got me thinkin... seein as i feel kinda dorky now. (fucker) :lol:


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 32 posts ] 

All times are UTC


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

Can we be honest?

We want your email address. Let me send you the best seduction techniques ever devised... because they are really good.
close-link