Quote:
I have two comments to this:
1) Who are you to deem that lifestyle isn't attractive? You don't think he has interesting stories, which convey traits about him and his life from meeting so many different people? He is meeting women every night, which means he is social. You don't know how he came to his position, he may have once had a different lifestyle or environment that socialized him correctly.
Don't be so quick to judge. I once had a conversation with a janitor at Tulane University in New Orleans from around midnight to 6 a.m. He introduced me to a fellow janitor who was educated and smarter than most of the people he cleaned after. But none of the students knew that. I think about that conversation before I start judging people.
Don't be so quick to think I am judging janitors I don't know. I clean up peoples vomit and I used to feed old ladies steak dinners through straws......
I don't make uneducated assumptions. I make judgments from my informed and experienced perspective. Doesn't make them true to you,
but it makes them accurate to me.
I knew the guy and the situation - that's why I used that as an example.
xfman wrote: "...or at least the future successful PUA will be more sided as naturals, with more of a lifestyle than a method..."
My point is all third generation pick up artists actively work on their lifestyle. Where as the appeal of a natural isn't always on his lifestyle. It is on the fact that he is in some way, naturally attractive. It might be his lifestyle, but more often (in my experience) that isn't the case.
People working to improve all aspects of their lives shouldn't be labeled as trying to become naturals. Because naturals are not actively working to improve their life; therefore, we are not striving to be them.
We are working to be naturally attractive - an
ATTRIBUTE we share with people who are naturally good at picking up women.
I don't know. Besides your misunderstanding, I think we are basically agreeing (in different words) on the same thing.