Quote:
Ive been reading up on a lot of stuff, but I'm starting to have doubts about this whole thing. The main reason why I'm having these doubts is because I see very little proof of mystery or style in-field skill. All I have heard is talk, there's only one video on the net of mystery doing alright. In fact i want to ask the question of why don't many mpua's post videos of how good they are. After all the seminars are not cheap and with a price like that there should be many videos of the mpua's proving their skills.
I don't mean to be pessimistic but I was hoping to find many videos of the so called gurus of the Venusian arts. Especially from the builders of this psychology such as mystery, ross jeffries or even style. And yet even with all the talk it sounds like they maybe a little camera shy. I think its because every now and then when someone approaches they got shot down. maybe even the MM requires the law of probability when meeting women, there is no 100% fool proof way maybe a 75% technique.
please feel free to comment and enlighten me with your knowledge.
I used to think that, too. Then I did what anyone ought to do if they want "proof" of Mystery method - went and tried that shit out!
I'm not going to lie, I need to work hard on my inner game - i'm outwardly very confident but not necessarily alpha, and i really need to work on building my self-belief (NLP helps with this). but my best mate and I have had ridiculous levels of success just by basically bearing in mind:
1) YOU ARE THE PRIZE
2) be cocky funny
3) Never give her what she thinks she wants
I don't need to see video evidence to know that women respond to being negged, DHV routines etc. some of the more outlandish stories seem far-fetched but if you can internalise this stuff then i don't see why it wouldn't have those results. believe my man.