Quote:
Quote:
But I have been reflecting on all this. And I fear a lot of guys in this PUA universe operate at quite a shallow level and either consciously or covertly believe that life/women/relationships are ALL about the physical level - the sex.
That couldn't be further from the truth. Anyone doing well with women will immediately dismiss that claim. In fact, focusing on the physical is one of the main reasons guys fail in the first place.
Women are all about the emotion and that's generally the catalyst between amazing sex and sex you wish you didn't have. What she feels on a physical level is enhanced or undermined by what she feels on a mental level.
But that's sex. And before you get there you need to be seen as a sexual option. If not, you're seen as a friend. And the difference lies between men who are not afraid to express their sexuality, and men who are.
And in the end, sex is the most intense emotional and physical contact between two people. That's the reason it's so important and that's what guys are usually incapable of understanding and implementing.
There's a reason why most topics are "Help, we're friends but I want more" and not "Help, we're having so much sex but I want friendship too".
And by the way, emotion is not restricted to love and mushy feelings. It's also desire, lust, passion and surrendering control to a man who you confidently know will lead.
Quote:
I suspect many of you guys secretly despise women for the power they hold over you and yet being so pathetically 'game-able' - sometimes frankly it's hard not to.
If they hold any power over you it's because you're giving it to them.
Quote:
OK but the more and more I have reflected on this, the more I now realise that even if what you are seeking is a deep, meaningful romantic relationship, it's not enough to be a decent human being, to be sincere/honest & charming, to get on really well, to make each other laugh, to share ethical values and interests, to make each other feel great when around each other....
...one does ALSO need to tap into a woman's raw, animal, sexual desire. Ultimately, if you don't turn her on then someone else will. Maybe a relationship is a bit like a three legged stool:
A) Mind (intellect/emotions),
B) Body (sex) and
C) Spirit (morals/ethics/soul - your highest self)
i.e. If any one of those legs of the stool is broken, the entire relationship becomes unstable.
Yes J, obviously you are not entitled to a woman's intimacy simply because you're quote on quote nice to her.
So yes,
also tap into her sexual nature and you're no longer a potential friend, but a potential lover. I underlined "also" because in essence, a relationship has very much all the characteristics of a friendship, plus intimacy.
However, and this is important, you never go from one to the other. You
start as either one or the other.
It rather depends on what you mean by "doing well with women". About half of my really good friends are men and about half are women. A lot of men can't seem to do that. Is that "doing well with women"?
I know a number of men who are extremely good at getting women into bed FAST on a "fuck and chuck" basis. Does that count? Some of them are widely loathed human beings - by both sexes - but are sufficiently manipulative to keep seducing and seducing and seducing, ideally with ever new ladies. (Fwiw, A married guy I know very well does this endless, endless, endless mental seduction, just for the buzz but I know for a fact that he never physically cheats on his wife.) Very often these charming guys who are "super-successful" with women are either sociopaths or narcissists. This type of person is a deeply, deeply flawed human beings (think: vain, manipulative, arrogant, self-serving, aloof, deeply selfish, attention-seeking etc etc) who are ultimately not pleasant to be around and will always, without exception end up destroying all close relationships around them.
Personally I have quite a lot of women interested but I have a history of being picky - too much for my own good no doubt. But I am also aware how easy it is to get women who you happen to get on with sexually interested in you, when you are NOT interested in them! It's very easy to become rather manipulative and to send "buying signals" to women who if one is being honest one has no genuine interest in, beyond a quick shag. But if you sense that she is falling in love with you, then in my book that is deeply unethical.
It's just when one gets too keen that one becomes "weak" and the wheels come off and one crashes and burns horribly.
When looking at the whole thing dispassionately - to give context I am trained as a biological scientist with an interest in evolutionary theory - I do find it curious how "binary" the woman's mind seems to be. i.e. The longer two humans have been friends the harder it is for them to become sexual partners. i.e. If you are in the friend zone you tend to get stuck there. It is very rare for two people who just like each other to build a friendship and seamlessly just fall for each other and start having sex. From first principles I don't really understand why that should be. Surely a close friendship is a form of emotion. But how come it is so hard to use it as a platform to build a sexual/romantic relationship?
Likewise, although you do sometimes get girls who are up for sex with their friends AKA "fuck buddies" it is remarkably unusual too. Men on the other hand are in general much less binary and can handle the blur between a sexual relationship and a friendship relationship much better than women.
> There's a reason why most topics are "Help, we're friends but I want more" and
> not "Help, we're having so much sex but I want friendship too".
Agreed but precisely what is that reason?
When you say sex is all about emotion for a women, this I find this confusing. How come a really intense friendship doesn't count as "emotion" in this context? How come genuinely liking, admiring, valuing, feeling close to, really understanding, someone doesn't seem to count?