Quote:
Now you know more than researchers. you break down their studies and accept what you want and disregrad the others.
Meanwhile you offer no research that anything you ever said on this forum is true, and not hogwash you believe is true.
do you get this irate and spiteful every time someone dis-agrees with your opinion?
why does it bother you so much that someone asks you for a link to a study? especially when you say that what you are saying is ''backed up by science''
Quote:
I gave you studies, where are yours?
you posted two links and the first link you linked don't even suggest that people won't date people that are not physically the same as them, they just suggest that commonalities attract, not that ''they have to attract'' or ''people who are physically not the same won't date'' or ''people without commonalities won't have sex'' they simply suggest that it's common for people to seek out mates that are similar to them, no where on that whole wiki page does it suggest that people don't end up mis-matched or don't date outside of what is physically the same as them, there is a big difference between commonly, and always
the second link was a study done on hot or not, that basically states how physically attractive someone is does not alter there perception of how physically attractive someone else is, but people who are rated as more attractive, have more rigid standards, it states that people look for traits comparable to their parents and go for what they find attractive not necessarily that everyone has a universal ''league'' that they date within, just simply
Quote:
physically attractive people tend to date other physically attractive people
even though the data is biased to one particular source (a website hot or not), what it does not state is that people always date people physically the same as them, it just suggests that attractive people are more popular to date, have higher standards, and tend to date other people that are rated as attractive, it also doesn't even specify what even qualifies a person as physically attractive
if you qualify to a person as physically attractive enough, you are within their dating pool, you do not have to be ''in their league'' and looks are subjective from person to person, if a girl thinks you're attractive but you're deemed as a 7 and she's a 10, irrelevant, you are attractive enough, if a girl likes fat guys but is an 8, and you are a fat guy socially considered as a 4 to most, irrelevant, you are attractive enough, it's subjective to what the person values as attractive
also, with all this focus on looks, if you are under the impression that girls seek out guys with the same sexual criteria as guys, and need references to theories relating to evolutionary psychology and the idea that women seek out men who are not only ''good looking'' but have a wider access to resources and security (social status/financial status), there are plenty of books out there for you, the red queen for one is a pretty good read and matt ridley has won numerous awards for his books (non fiction), but there are tons out there, just google ''books on evolutionary psychology'' and look specifically for books that relate to sexual selection and natural selection, it's not like what I'm saying is purely conjecture but you're the one who is claiming that your opinions are ''based on science'' with nothing sighted at first to give an insight as to what science exactly supports your opinion, and then getting upset when someone has a different view from your own and would like to see what you are referring to
Quote:
The answer is, they gravitate to their own kind, and with regards to looks, they view people at their own level of attractiveness and go after that. Whatever the reason, but the main reason is they subconciously know that is what they have the best chance of succeeding with.
commonalities attract, but looks are subjective, and plenty of people will sleep with others that they are not all that attracted to when they are short on options or are into a lifestyle of promiscuity, if you haven't seen this in your own life then that suggests you don't interact with very many people, everyone does not share a universal ideal of what is attractive, not male, not female and you don't need a study to prove this, just a pair of eyes and a couple questions for more then 10 people, just ask them what turns them on in the opposite sex and it's highly likely that you will have a range of a bunch of different answers (especially if you are asking girls)
Quote:
So if that is true the hot ones wont want you unless you are hot too. You might soil her family tree!
hmm, sure, but by that logic you seem to be presenting the idea that unattractive girls want unattractive guys... every girl and guy won't want you unless they find you attractive, hard to be attracted by something you are not attracted to
Quote:
the hot ones wont want you unless you are hot too
the unattractive ones are the same way, and what one girl who is deemed an 8 finds as attractive can be vastly different then what another girl who is deemed an 8 finds attractive, but the real question is, what does that girl personally see as ''hot'', just because a girl is a 4, doesn't mean she wants to sleep with male 4s, just because a guy is a male 5, doesn't mean he wants to sleep with female 5s, and it doesn't mean that they will end up sleeping with a 4 and a 5, what matters is if the person in question finds the other person attractive or not, not if you personally objectively see them as ''in the same league'' or not, a 9 is just as likely to fuck a guy you perceive as a 7, as a guy you perceive as a 9 when she perceives both guys to be a 7, it's completely subjective to the girl in question rather then the ''league'', and once you qualify to a person as ''attractive enough'' then you have potential access to them and they are within your dating pool
if you look at a girl and think... yeah definitely an 8/10, that girl should be with Xguy because she's an 8/10, then she goes and dates some fat ugly club owner guy with lots of money that she has a whole bunch of thing in common with, instead of the hot looking poor guy showing up at her work with flowers that she doesn't find all that interesting, is that so mind blowing?.... BUT WHAT? NOT IN THE SAME LEAGUE? QU'EST-CE!?
and thinking like this is just creating a bunch of negative stereotypes in your head about people, it's like guys that rationalize that good looking girls are all stuck up bitches, absolutely not so
and perpetuating these kind of beliefs on a pickup forum is the equivalent of telling guys ''don't go approach that girl you are interested in, that girl is out of your league'' absolute bullshit, and it reflects a guy who never tries and wants excuses so he can rationalize that he is helpless and doesn't have to put forth an effort, guarantee you plenty of guys who have got into cold approach have dated up, and plenty have dated down, you don't need a study to prove the completely obvious
your personal experience and ''science'' say that people won't date outside their league, my personal experience contradicts the idea that there is such thing as a universal ''league'', you are either attractive to someone or you are not, and it is subjective from person to person, if that enrages you to the point where you want to have a 20 page flame battle insisting that I'm acting as some sort of arrogant ignorant expert who is not entitled to a conflicting opinion, while you're just stating the facts and ''it's backed by science'' even though what you are sighting that is ''backed by science'' doesn't even contradict my opinion, then hey, you're right, I'm wrong, have at it, I'm not interested in continuing this thread any further, it's pointless