I think natural is a man that is great with woman, not only for his looks/wealth/power/etc but because he naturally developed the mating skill, like when guys have sex at a very young age and thus are not afraid to be very sexual around women, who in turn get that subcommunication and are attracted to them.
IRC in the old jargon there where 3 (sane) men , AFC's, Naturals and PUAS's.
AFC was mostly the generic men with varying degrees of success with women, some got laid by luck, others but very little skill, others didn't at all, and most where brainwashed by social conditioning that women where pure and thus put them on pedestals.
Natural , well what I wrote up, someone naturally good with woman for different reasons, naturals are great with them, though they generally don't know why, they are unconsciously competent, their body knows how to work them, they may understand a bit about it , but they can't condense their knowledge and teach it to someone simply because it's to natural to them, like when DD said that it would be hard for you to teach someone to breath , because is natural for you.
and PUAs, who are everyone on this forum, were once an AFC that wanted to be good with woman, and had to learn it the hard way, through experience, someone who is good with woman, but learned it, he didn't naturally came up with it early in his teens, but knows what he is doing, he completely understand what works and doesn't with woman.
That is why i don't think we AFC's can ever become Naturals, but i also think that a PUA is superior to a Natural getting women, because he understand what he is doing and thus can improve it, therefore having greater choice than a Natural.
thus a pua proves that : dedication and hard work surpass talent.
People seem to stigmatise the term "pua" and relate it to a social robot who only does routines, or never shows true emotion, but I think those so called "new naturals" (Gambler

) are but PUAs in the end, who are more direct in their aproach.