Have you been told that it is immoral to try to pick up, seduce, court a woman who is attached?

I will now give you stone cold, iron-clad proof of the antithetical view point. In other words, that it is your duty, moral obligation and good for society to do so in many cases.

I start with proposing 5 foundations or tenets for my argument.

1. Think of each woman you meet as someone's sister, daughter, best friend

2. Also set a new "frame". If you really do love, respect and adore women as I do, don't you want them to be with the guy that is the best for them, irrespective of the guy that is with them "first".

3. A woman's reptile brain and limbic system CANNOT help it but is "hard wired" to gravitate towards the source of the highest "survival" and "emotional value". This is because it is most conducive for her short term and long term survival of her genetic material.

4. In society, we as men are the hunters/gathers, we court, pursue but women are the ultimate gate keepers for sex. In other words, if sex happens it is ultimately because they allowed you to penetrate them and engage in coitus or even conception.

5. Often a woman will simply date a guy so she doesn't appear unwanted, obtuse, is not negatively stigmatized by her friends, peers, family, society. In other words, the guy is simply filling the "empty space" on her right arm and nothing more. On a visceral level, she is not drooling over him, nor is crazy for him, nor thinks of him with the thought of "Oh my God, what an Alpha God King Supreme ohhhhh my panties need a changing every 5 minutes". Trust me.

So based on these 5 foundational truisms my argument is that it is "perfectly natural, beneficial and in fact even morally just" to pursue a woman who is attached. Lastly, when I say attached, I am usually referring to a woman with a boyfriend. I tend to not want to or like to break up marriages. I almost did 3. For now and going forward that is forbidden territory, however if a woman is simply dating someone with no ring on her finger, then I will pursue her.

Having said this if you meet a woman and she is attached then unless she says "I can't talk to you", "I am attached, please leave me alone", then don't stop.

I continue to demonstrate my best foot forward, my best "Self", my dynamic personality,worldliness, emotional maturity, life experience, masculinity etc. In fact I know that most men DO NOT and WILL NOT posses my savoir faire, my multi faceted personality, worldliness, character, charm, social intelligence,, culture, class, Alpha male traits. At this point, if a woman, even one who is attached fancies me over her current BF or in many cases subservient, docile, boring boytoy, then there is nothing wrong with that.

Once again here is why.

1. If a woman crosses that line with me, that is not my moral obligation or moral comprise but hers as she is the ultimate gate keeper for sex. Furthermore, who is to say that is moral/immoral. She is simply doing what is instinctively natural based on the workings of her limbic and Reptile brain., meaning aligning with a male who possess and exhibits higher emotional and survival value.

2. Think about your sister or female family member which she does represent to some. Wouldn't you want her to be the the TOP DOG, the most genetically suited for her, emotionally sound, stable, confident, secure, decisive, courageous, strong minded/bodied? Of course. Also, just because a woman is attached, does that mean she should be "held hostage" on the mere virtue she has a bf or because someone simply got her to date him first. Hell no. We have a return or exchange policy with tangibles or an upgrade process when dealing with gadgets. So too, should this apply to people and partners if someone else comes along who is a better and greater fit.

3. Don't forget that often times a woman will not know any better or will simply just grab a guy to be her chaperone to events or to save face, since if she appears "empty handed" at functions or in front of her family, friends, she will be questioned and stigmatized. So go ahead and let her be aware of your existence because if you are the type of guy I am, then a woman will wish she met me 20 years ago. Remember, often women don't know any better. They think what they have is acceptable or some women think their partner is the best. However, that is only because they don't know "me" yet. This is my philosophy. Lastly, I won't rationalize why I am the superior choice. I will simply engage her, non verbally demo my personality, exhibit my wit, social intelligence, life/love/sexual experience, my unparalleled ability to hunt/gather/protect/honour and let her make the choice for herself.

However, if she decides that it is me over her current partner, then that is natural, normal, conducive to the survival of mankind and very morally sound for those that will make a moral judgement call on this.

_________________
Omar aka McMaax
Maaximum Seduction

You raise interesting points about women 'settling'. I don't think its discussed enough in PUA about how girls with boyfriends will just coast along until someone more interesting comes along. Unfortunately, most guys won't realise that the girl is interested as they assume because she has a boyfriend, she isn't interested.