Quote:
I'm actually surprised that this whole sorta thing came up on here, but it seems like PUA has really begun to spark a huge discussion into gender relations. Or rather, is a symptom of a broader problem in gender relations.
There would be no need of a system if the current one worked. As it stands, women have the passive dating role and men have the active dating role when taking into account "traditionalism." Sexodus is men checking out of society or as I put it, men taking their ball and going home. Quite frankly, I do not understand it? Basically, women are doing the "passive dating role" on a astronomical level dating men out of their league and several levels higher on the attractive scale. Men they would have normally dated on their attractive scale are giving up. This seems ridiculous but, seems to be the case. A recent article pointed out that a man from Quebec was recently court ordered to pay child support for 3/4 children despite dna testing proven they are not his. Link provided in another thread or maybe this one. This is another argument why these men take up MGTOW or Sexodus.
There seems to be a crisis amongst the genders. I think men and women are failing to see the poison drops everywhere. The feminist poison drop in "I don't need a man" statements until her friends all get married and until men stop paying attention to her. When she "hits the wall" and attractiveness disappears forever. The fear for most men should be that, she wants marriage and not him. She wants access to his resources but, what value does she bring to the relationship? Women are having sex without marriage and the liability associated. As I stated many times, I always thought I would have been settled by now, married, children, wife, a family and even the white picket fence too! As I got older, I realized that it is much more complicated, and life is.
I recently posted a thread that did not seem to take. It is about developmental theory, relationships, and attachment styles. The book is called "Attached." Attachment styles (secure, avoidant, anxious) persist among male and females. Based upon the action to check out of society, I suspect most MGTOW or Sexodus men are likely avoidant. Developmental theory touches on things like parenting and a child's attachment styles following early childhood. This book "attached" argues that it follows a child into adulthood and into their relationships. If a man is avoidant, he is checking out of society, factors like parenting as well as life long experience play a huge role. If these men have spent their lives rejected and friend zoned, it would play into their self concept. More importantly, pending their attachment styles, it is not hard to imagine someone who is "avoidant" having had a series of poor life experiences with women would enter "sexodus." Its not much of a solution but, it likely is a possible reason.
Then again, I could be reaching at straws here.