Quote:
Whilst I'd certainly sway more on Detox's side of this debate, I would just mention that even the theory Detox discusses needs limits or it isn't going to be successful. If you drone on about yourself and brag about various things, you're going to come across as a bore rather than impressing.
I agree very much with Detox's last paragraph as well, but would possibly take that further if he doesn't mind me doing so. If you're just looking for a one night stand, then to be honest you can probably omit the Carnegie theory bit altogether more often than not. However, if you're looking for a number of dates and a possible relationship or similar, then you do need to start building more rapport and can use the Carnegie theory bit more extensively. However, I think it's important that you've ALREADY built attraction before this. If you go straight in with the Carnegie theory bit, you're likely to end up in the friend zone. If you've built attraction first, then sort of drip-feed the Carnegie bit in little drop by drop the more times you see the girl, whilst retaining an element of the attraction, then that's probably going to bring the most success in terms of slightly more long term relationships.
I wouldn't disagree with any of this. You need to work the Friendly/rapport/comfort/compatibility aspects into any relationship you want to last, unless its a totally dysfunctional relationship.
However, as in almost all my posts, I tell new guys to almost solely focus on attraction as they need a ton of help learning how to generate attraction, Whilst they tend to come from a background of going overboard with friendly/rapport/comfort. Experienced guys can moderate these different elements, but left to their own devices a lot of AFCS like to just focus on "Friendly mode" because thats all they know, and they cant make progress this way.