I'm little torn on this myself. I see great examples for both sides every day.

_________________
Http://Dating-Musings.com

I took a peak at the thread again and saw the preposterous $1000/hour SPAM offer... which prompted me to check this guy out a little more. Did anyone realize he has a whole book out?

What's better, check out this critical review of it and Corey's responses:

https://www.amazon.com/gp/customer-revi ... 0692552669

_________________
Likes attract likes. All comments are geared towards generating lasting attraction for the purpose of a relationship with a well-rounded female (attractive, well educated and cultured, plus knows what she wants in her work and personal life).

Wow. Just, wow. I didn't know he goes on Amazon attacking critics who simply point out that his book is just opinions.

The suspect "5 Star" reviews that show up every day all mentioning the same points should be a wake up call to anyone.

I was totally aware of his deleting YouTube comments when people say "I tried exactly what you say to do with a number of girls and it failed every time.

Here this guy is spouting opinions but then guys contradict them with their own experiences from and they get deleted for that...?.!!!

But I thought that was it.

_________________
Http://Dating-Musings.com

I was actively 'sarging' back in 2008. Since then, the PUA / dating / life-coaching / whatever business really has blown up to basically anyone being able to write and publish whatever and pass it off as "the best way" - no evidence or citations of anything needed. In this day and age when it comes to "pickup", basically anything goes. An opinion about something will be from black to white - and all along in the greys.

It's good that some of these guys at least try to define the terms they use.. neediness, attraction signals, whatever. At the same time, it makes it impossible to communicate with others about this stuff, since the definitions basically become endless - whatever you want them to be.

_________________
Likes attract likes. All comments are geared towards generating lasting attraction for the purpose of a relationship with a well-rounded female (attractive, well educated and cultured, plus knows what she wants in her work and personal life).

Books are opinions? I had no idea. Anyone who attacks Corey for that isn't very bright.

_________________
Pickup coach. PM for direct, simple coaching.

I suppose you'll have to get into semantics and define attack vs. critique. Corey deleted his first response .. he blew up and embarrassed himself, it would seem.

_________________
Likes attract likes. All comments are geared towards generating lasting attraction for the purpose of a relationship with a well-rounded female (attractive, well educated and cultured, plus knows what she wants in her work and personal life).

I'm having trouble telling which 'he' is 'he' here?

What response was deleted? Who blew up? Who got embarrassed?

_________________
Http://Dating-Musings.com

Both the critiquer and Corey got their first posts deleted in that comment thread.

The critic got his comment by Amazon for foul language, I think.

And then Corey deleted his own first response for some reason, also.

The critic claimed Corey blew up in his first response.

_________________
Likes attract likes. All comments are geared towards generating lasting attraction for the purpose of a relationship with a well-rounded female (attractive, well educated and cultured, plus knows what she wants in her work and personal life).

What makes you say that? He's good for noobs....ie dealing with texting etc.....but for more advanced/harcore I watch Blanc/Valentine etc