| To those out there wishing to impart insight,
I've starting on MM, and Mystery has said that the real hardcore game plans work best on 9s and 10s. Something has bothered me about the rating system, and it isn't merely the assigning of a numerical value to another human being - it's how that numerical value is garnered in the first place. How does one know a 10 in the first place? I'm sure there plenty of insanely hot women out there that ping most guys Game-o-Meter (patent pending) that I would flat-out ignore. Take former target Paris Hilton. I don't care how many other guys want to be around her (the media throng at Bondi last New Years was passe), I don't care how much money she, how insecure she is inside, or what her celebrity cache is - there is on interest there beyond her having XX chromosones. I can point to a half-dozen female celebrities I would rather get to know on ANY level, and my ignoring of a woman like Paris would be based on genuine lack of interest. (request for a list)
Before anyone says I'm automatically pre-judging someone I've never met and has an awful lot of media hype, women copy her in an attempt to portray her (the Paris Hilton gameplan?), and all it says to me is that they may well be chart-topper, but, by your outward portrayal, you just lost my interest.
[this leads me to believe that a major chunk of problem is a lack of inner game]
This garralous exposition leads me to the reason for writing; I'm afraid my standards are shot. I'm not talking to a 10 because I'm excluding her, I'm not talking to a 10 because I'm afraid I've been socially programmed to value her <6 friend IS the 10.
Yes, I've asked, and spewed forth, a veritable Vesuvius. I think I may have warned some folk about that somewhere. [waves hand in a disinterested manner, gesturing elsewhere...]
|