Unanswered topics | Active topics |
New posts | Your posts
| Author | Message |
| Xseducer | PostPosted: Sun Nov 02, 2008 3:50 am | |
| Offline | | New to MPUA Forum | Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2008 10:27 pm Posts: 22 | | Hey,
As I have studied and practise and perfected The Game, i've come to realize men tend to look for different systems and different styles. Like there is NLP, Routine Game, Natural Game, Dynamite Game, etc...
But people tend to go the easy route(don't lie) and focu mainly on one brand. Neglecting Inner for Outter or vice versa. And with game type there are different styles. Like group, lone, wingman, wingwoman, etc...
So what Game and Style do you guys do?
With all my years of study I have combined a perfect Inner Game and Perfect outter game, though there is much I haven't studied about NLP, I think it's a waste of time and doesn't deserve the title of being part of Game. There is a bigger pay off with a both inner game and outter game.
Till then, stay sweet
-X _________________ http://seductionbasics.blogspot.com/
The Real Deal. Enough said.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
| Jaybot | PostPosted: Sun Nov 02, 2008 1:08 pm | |
| Offline | | PUA Forum Leader |  | Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2008 10:19 am Posts: 1688 Location: UK | | I break my interaction down into three parts;
Disarm
Connect
Close
The main goals for each section are to get rid of any potential interruptions in disarm, whilst taking down her bitch shied and building attraction. Then show interest in her once she has deserved it (so far similar to MM). Then in the connection phase I try to create a deep emotional connection (I've never told anyone this but..., Not many people know this), in this part I also try to show a tiny bit of weakness (not enough to DLV but enough to show I am opening up to them), in this part of the interaction escalation is the main thing to be thinking of whilst DHV. Then comes closing.
I try to keep my game original by using only line have made up with, then have a few lines memorized to deal with certain situations.
In terms of gurus I think the opening is pure MM then I switch to a more juggler style to build rapport.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
| vitaminc | PostPosted: Sun Nov 02, 2008 1:37 pm | |
| Offline | | MPUA Forum Zealot | Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 7:34 am Posts: 341 | | i've taken bits and pieces from everything i've read and mixed it all together... i use the parts of MM, mehow, c&f and juggler method that actually suit my personality rather than creating an avatar around those methods. it makes it feel more natural to me, i dont feel like i'm trying to be someone else anymore because the things i took from each method fits perfectly into who i am. i'm also working my way through the forum to find new things that others here came up with that is congruent with my personality.
i always go out with friends, normally open a set on my own and stay alone in the set, sometimes i'd invite them to merge with my other group...
also sometimes use a wing or pivot, havent used a pawn yet.
i think its pretty important to mix and match methods to suit you... it's probably the best way to have your inner game congruent with your outer game.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
| VanHaven | PostPosted: Sun Nov 02, 2008 4:13 pm | |
| Offline | | MPUA Forum Addict | Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2007 2:21 am Posts: 254 Location: Texas | | I stick with mostly natural game. I started out working with MM as most do, but it just didn't suit me. When I found Wayne Elise's stuff it really clicked. I've got a seminar of his I watch from time to time just as a refresher. The e-book I always refresh from is called the Don Juan Bible. It takes from several different styles, but it mostly natural.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|