Quote:
Dabura,
you have a point. By rejecting and being reluctant and being "let's just have sex without emotions involved" you demonstrate superior genetic value. This is why "scumbags" and "gangstahs" from lowest ranks of society often fuck white middle class women. Even though women know rationally these men are no good, their lizard brain pretty much dictates that they will follow them. After all they are hard-wired to crave that which is just beyond their reach.
Conversely, once they have you, (as you say "I 'accidentally' demonstrate my emotional attachment and appreciation") they flake. Why? Because that's when they have what they can have. They want what they cannot have. Instinctively they always want to make a +1 trade up the genetic ladder. Even if this means going with Mumet the cutpurse above Leonard the software engineer. With other words men with serious intentions have to repress their true feelings whereas "act rough streetlife thugs" get all the bang.
On a deeper level, Dabura, you point to something of greater importance here: how can stable relationships with emotional attachment flourish in a society where women just fuck 'n flake? We are talking about the cornerstone of civilization here. After all, Man is not a solitary animal like cats who come together to mate and live solitary beyond that.
This lizard-brain effect is what old societies and ancient philosophers understood. And why cultural conservative traditions imbued women with a strong sense of care, support and family-mindedness. However we are now destroying this with affirmative action and "if it feels good, it must be good" hedonism.
Agreed, restrictions and customs placed on people's sexuality where there for a reason. Women are hypergamous, they will go for the "Alphas". Traditional marriage before the no fault divorce laws came into play, secured your ordinary average "beta" male have a chance of hitting the evolutionary jackpot. Whenever a society began to openly embrace polygamy, then it's own collapse followed swiftly after. We are talking about raw biology and behavioural economics, none of this cushy "Oh you will find love one day" rhetoric, which even women barely believe nowadays.
Traditional marriage was the cornerstone of Western civilisation, because it rewarded men led responsible and productive lives. If your average joe worked his way up in a career that was a service to his community and country, he would be pretty much guaranteed to have a wife to raise a family with. Statistics show that married men are by far the most hardest workers and productive in any society.
There was a regression after divorce became commonplace, and women were encouraged to compete and act like a man in the "man's world". . Before long the married man became a ridiculed figure, treated with contempt, and people wonder why men in their droves are now avoiding marriage.
Women don't desire "love" they desire the emotional roller coaster which the bad boy could give them. To be fucked rigorously by the high status male who commits the most dominating act, of leaving her quivering on the bed with his essence all over her. Average men no longer have any unique status or value, because they can't dominate financially, socially, or personally; as it's the average man who swallows political correctness up.
We have gone back to the rules of the jungle now in the West. Already our interpersonal relationships and families are beginning to resemble the tribal landscape of the deepest depths of Africa. Where "it takes a village to raise a family" - Hilary Clinton.
Now lets be objective and see how far that has helped their civilisation progress.
CHAT
