Im un sure if this is something other PUAs use. Credit to anyone that may have originaly suggested this, which I then forgot I read, and started using believing I hadn't heard of it before. Anywho on with the gambit.

You take the target and suggest a game, you each have to hit on a member of the opposite sex in the worst possible way while still appearing believable. Feel free put a bet on it. When you are doing just chat a girl up the same way and afc would, do all the things as a PUA you have learnt not to do. When its her turn, I tend to react differently depending on what stage in the interaction im in. Attraction/early comfort; I will occupy her targets friends a bit of jealousy and further preselection (all be it pre-after-selection) never hurts at this point. If used further on in comfort I tend to add to the conspiracy frame we have created by the game.

Benefits of this.

1) Acts as a comparison of your AFC ways and PUA ways. Any overlapping areas can be looked . For instance if when deliberately acting afc you notice you have the same posture as when you aren't doing it deliberatly. Then take a look at your posture. It acts a self assesment tool.

2) It gives the target a reminder of what most people that approach her do (like you approached a girl in the 'game') showing how you're different and adding a DHV

3) Adds a conspiracy frame, only you two are in on this 'game'

4) Can be or transition to be a point of sharing vulenerabilties about rejection (if she gets knocked back all be it on purpose)

5) By hitting on other people in front of her, even though she knows its a game, jealousy can ensue . Also can occur while you occupy a female obstacle to her male target.

I've personal add some things every now and again to the end to keep it fresh. For example if I feel trust needs to be built I will promise to step in if her target actually tries to chat her up in return, which of course I will then do...........eventually. And by stepping in I may just have to K-close to show she isn't available to him.

Has anyone been using something like this? Is it by chance a well known gambit/routine that i have somehow managed to shield my knowledge from? Will a sequence for the prime numbers ever be discovered?

For the record if you can actually solve the last one, what the hell are you doing on the reading this you could be making millions by now.

_________________
Note to self: Reffering to Chief by something other than his name has the knock on effect of strolling into the chat room and being asked; 'Crumpetberry are you a single hippie looking for a man'

Careful now, I've used something very similar in your area! All be it only once but if they were as student-bitch as some then you could find this is common knowledge.

I do like the idea - do you actually intend to lead it somewhere (the k-close) always? Any time I've done something similar, the guy melts.

_________________

I'm a winner - I am going to win.

Yeh , I 've done this around the Bath area. I don't always lead it towards a K -close , depends what phase I'm at. Though more often than not I can end it with the K-close. Its pretty adaptable once you get the flow going. I usually throw in the option of choosing the person the other has to hit on, gives you a little more control of what the other guy is likely to do.

_________________
Note to self: Reffering to Chief by something other than his name has the knock on effect of strolling into the chat room and being asked; 'Crumpetberry are you a single hippie looking for a man'

lol

_________________
No longer the survival of the fittest, it is now the survival of the smoothest.