my wing way just walking up to girls and saying some pretty nasty shit than he chocked it up to "GM style" wtf

_________________
Don't hate the player hate the game
carpe diem
be social
"it is better to die on you feet than live on your knees"

www.seductiondatabase.com

wbafc--bafc--afc--rafc--pua--mpua--pug--natural--god

Maybe he's talking about Style Neil Strauss? Though I doubt it. Style doesn't advocate talking shit to girls. If anyone it would be DeAngelo, who advocates NEGs a bit too much sometimes.

_________________
http://www.solomonseagal.com

Anyone can walk into a bar and pick up a random girl.
The trick is to make the experience unforgettable to her.
A real PUA will make every women he encounters feel like she experience something once in a lifetime.

I don't think it has anything to do with any of the gurus. Its an approach to overwhelming a chick with sexual induendos/rude comments. Followed up with a J/K or a "I'm sorry hug". Throwing all that sexual talk at her can get her horny.

If you want a better description
http://www.fastseduction.com/guide/03_A ... e/gm.shtml

no no no.. GM style is otherwise known as "Grand Master Style". is was founded by a paris-based PUA named Grand Master. GM style is based in coutinuous smutty jokes and humerous sex-talk with keen attention to how the girl reacts. this is a very agressive style and is very high risk, but that is why you have to know how to use it. basically just opening up with "lets get bust" and without her getting a word in, you comeback with just kidding, just kidding. then you get at it again with another comment like the first. if you make it past this.. its a good indicator you can get her in bed.

you will want to neg her negative, compliment yourself, call her a slut, quote her somehting naughty
ill post some GM style openers for you in another post

_________________
"The biggest obstacle standing between where you are, and where you want to be, is you"

GM style is something I pretty much operate naturally in.

It's a case where you can get away with pretty much saying anything (wordswise) as long as your delivery, bodylanguage, and frame are strong enough.

Heavy role reversal, naughty jokes, all done with cheeky/playful kind of vibe.

My problem with this would be:

a) I don't think I've got above three to handle this.

b) Have you seen how foul-mouthed Aussie girls are? This would be a step in a classy direction for a lot of them.

gm style is natural, grand master style its a lost art. They said its like fool mate. Its a good style I have a big dick do you want to see it? Haha maybe later then if your good. I'm jk.

_________________
Life's an Art

http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fu ... =382875915

While it may work sometimes, it will almost never get you a real woman. Women who are receptive to it tend to be dumb, brainless, and overly promiscuous to begin with. This may be something that some guys look for, but not I.

As I remember, you are the author of that 'infamous' three-some thread?

And what does that have to do with GM style and its effectiveness Brad? Is there some sort of grudge you hold towards me that you'd like to publicly address. I never said anything about not wanting great sex or sex in general. But I would certainly like the women I have sex with to not be the town whorebag. I don't know, that's just me....

There is absolutely nothing wrong with GM style, but using it alone, in my opinion, will not yield the best results.

_________________
Amor est Vitae Essentia

I suspect promiscuity and threesomes go hand-in-hand, unless someone would like to split hairs?

As for a grudges, there are none; and the best way of resolving them is privately.

Keyword: OVERLY PROMISCUOUS.

Meaning, the girl that fucks the first guy who says something sexual towards her. There is nothing wrong with being promiscuous from time to time, because there is a time and a place for promiscuity, we've all been there, at least I hope so.

Anyway, I shared my viewpoint on GM style before, and overall I think it is lackluster, that's all I needed to share.

_________________
Amor est Vitae Essentia

Hmmm... splitting hairs!

Free dictionary def. of promiscuous: Having casual sexual relations frequently with different partners; indiscriminate in the choice of sexual partners.

Thanks dude! I didn't know that!

_________________
Amor est Vitae Essentia

My take..

It depends upon the guy.

The right guy can pull almost any style off, with an available and receptive woman as long as it meets these four criteria.

It is confident/bold.

It is socially contextual.

It builds sexual attraction/tension.

It escalates.

Establishing a sexual baseline or goal with a woman early in an interaction is always a good thing. There are two ways in which to do it. Direct and indirect. Too many guys seek to handle women with kid gloves and as naive entities especially early in an interaction. This is neither confident/bold nor does it build sexual attraction/tension.

This is a critical mistake in my opinion, wastes time, often frustrates women and causes them to make assumptions and generalities about you that are less than flattering.

Remember women are socialized to think of all men as 'dogs'. So if you are exhibiting non-dog behavior you are setting the wrong frame for the interaction and you give her far too much time to think of why she shouldn't consider you as a partner. I believe the term is 'boring'.

This is rooted in being too 'invested' in the outcome.

Either of you have the prerogative to end the escalation at any point if it seems not to be in your best interest.

Here..., PMZ members can read my newest member journal entry, 'why rejection is good for you' for more context.

why-rejection-is-good-for-you-vt11515.html

_________________
http://youtube.com/watch?v=4ufa-q7DcWM