Quote:
Yes but can you not see the problem with a direct opener?
If you convey any kind of attration interest before she is attracted to you, you will blow yourself out.
Now if you do this before displaying higher value to her, then you are letting her base her decision purely on your replicaiton value. I.E. your looks. Now this may work if you are David Beckham - every girl is gonna want him to come up to her and convey interest straight away.
But Im not him - lucky for you, if you are!
I think the only way a direct opener could work is if you are either like David Beckham, or if the girl has displayed some level of interest through proximity. Otherwise, you want to be hedging your bets by allowing her to become attracted to you through your DHV A2 routines, and then convey interest in A3.
PS. There is a kind of girl that I'm sure responds very well to direct openers from anyone - maybe found in Essex. But the game is set up to attract a certain quality of lady is it not?
MA
You live in the UK?
Come on one of my daygame courses, I'm running a free trial (see my sig).
You don't have to be especially good looking (I'm not) for a direct opener to work.
When you're doing your "attraction building" routine for 20-30 minutes, I've already arranged a date with her next week and got her number, and have moved on to the next girl.
You're suffering from a limiting belief that you need to go around proving your value to women, and that you need to "create" attraction in her before it's OK to tell her you're interested.
Guess what?
By having the confidence to actually be totally direct and honest about your desires to a woman, you actually display a massive amount of "value" and if she were ever to become attracted to you, she will be right then. In fact, most times girls will have made their decision from your initial first minute of interaction, REGARDLESS of what you say. If a girl was gonna fuck you already, then your A1-A3 material is unnecessary. If a girl wasn't then it doesn't matter what you say. So either way it's pointless.
How many times have you been indirect about your approach, spent 20-30 minutes in-set "building attraction," only for her to say she's got a boyfriend, or just go off with her friends never to be seen again? She was NEVER gonna fuck you from the first SECOND. But you wasted all that time because you're not "allowed" to express interest in her until you get an IOI (or so you think).
Why not just immediately filter out the girls who aren't interested within 1 minute, and only bother continuing an interaction with a girl who you KNOW is interested in you? That's just plain efficiency.
If you think this only bags low-quality women, you are dead wrong.
IN FACT
The quality of women you get through direct daygame are the HIGHEST. They are not the club slags out getting hammered. They are the young sexy professionals with proper jobs, aspirations, motivation and tons of self-confidence. They are educated, well-spoken, and you won't find them in even the most high end clubs, or very rarely.
I can tell you, as someone who is not classically good looking at all, that I consistently have 3/4 dates a week with 8s and 9s I meet in the street, when before I was doing indirect night game I would bag a 6 or 7 maybe every month and get a LOT of totally flakey numbers.
This shit works.
Read "Mode One" by Allen Roger Currie. He does the "exchange orgasms" line. Me personally, I just say they're very attractive and I want to find out about them. The point is to express a clear romantic interest from the outset.