http://www.pof.com/viewprofile.aspx?profile_id=28259455


comments, criticism, or concerns more then welcome. havent had a profile in months due to it sucking and barely getting any views/messages. made a new one after watching that cracking the online code vid. i got more views but not alot, and no messages. any advice?

_________________
New to the game, eager to learn.

God that Bravo PUa: Do not message me list is going to be the death of us all.

What you have in your profile is good you just don't have very much. Try to write a bunch more as girls actually read profiles unlike men. Don't spew facts in a profile, make it funny, cocky, and emotionally inspiring using bubblewords and sensewords.

So basically switch up the whole about me to be more real, yet maintain comical. The only thing that sketches me about doing this is that I come from a small town where there are only about 140,000 people and the majority are above 50. I know the girls on here are the same everyday and have already seen my profile (its the only one in my county that isn't generic, crazy as that sounds) so switching it now might make me look fake?

_________________
New to the game, eager to learn.

well that's a good point about the small town.

Perhaps the pictures alone may be enough to attract woman, they seem like good pictures. I would move to a big city as soon as possible if you want to get more girls if that's possible.

take the part out "Dont not message me if"

sounds so contrived, women read between the lines and it doesnt sound like you're disqualifying because you're characterizing people based on proession etc..

so, are all strippers beneath you? are all girls iwth implants beneath you (imagine you had small tit syndrome as a girl, you'd likely get them too)

Disqualifiers should be like what I have on my profile for example:

Here's a list of attributes you must have:
*A sense of humor - OK, you don't need to laugh at all my jokes, I'm terrible with puns but that's ok
and some of my jokes maybe corny as hell but you don't need to let me know this all the time - I know.
*Intelligence - a MASSIVE turn-on; not saying you have to have an IQ in the 95th percentile, but being
able to have meaningful conversations and informed opinions is one of the sexiest attributes a woman can
possess; I'm not really into bimbo types, if your boobs are artificially bigger than your head (I know what
you're already thinking but mine ARE in fact real:P) then perhaps we'd be better off as friends
*Assertiveness - an assertive woman (one who knows how to convey her wants, needs, and desires) is a
sexy woman, not a bytch
*Compromising - the word bytch is a synonym for non-compromising as far as I'm concerned, regardless
of whether you're male or female (yes ladies, we both know that men are typically bigger bytches)
*Spontaneous - I get it some things require planning and consideration but
every now and then a lil spontaneity can go a long way in keeping the attraction going. Predictability =
boring, am I right? I knew you'd agree!:D

*Sarcasm/dry wit - face it, you wouldn't be able to handle me without this


Infuse some humour in it, have fun with it chicks will see that - it's an opportunity to let your personality shine through instead of having a laundry list of everything you dont want - puts off negative vibes


Also, instead of saying what you DONT| want, why dont you tell your audience what you DO want!

Papa he got that disqualification list from BravoPUA so it isnt inherently bad, but I would just swtich it up a little bit. I like a disqualification list better then a laundry list of wants, it qualify s better and is much more entertaining

wants convey what you're looking for, shows confidence. A laundry list of disqualifiers looks like either you're standoffish or have a few screws loose. Personally I dont care what some PUA says online (obviously he can inflate his success like any one of us), I'm just stating what works from me and also basing my opinions on sound psychology.

Ideally you'll have a balance of both. Wants can be creatively conveyed as disqualifiers and you'll see how I used this in my post above.

The OP doesn't have much on his profile, it's anemic on content. It seems as though he's relying on a few pics of himself and some disqualifiers to reel in some 'fish'. There's nothing conveyed about his perosnality in the profile other than disqualifiers and something about zookeeping which seems so unidimensional. I don't see many DHVs either. But disqualifiers without having much more content = fishing without any bait.

I understand you disagree with a paid online professional with his own website, forums, and fan base. However I still hold, just as he does, that a inductive list of humorous yet standard enforcing disqualifies is more effective then the all to typical deductive wish list of wants, that every other crazy chick and AFC has n their profile. But we can agree to disagree.

the lack of content is a problem that I already addressed in my first response.