Quote:
Quote:
There is a universal and general consensus on what constitutes attractiveness.
Not true. The only things studies have confirmed as universally attractive are waist to hip ratio for women, and facial symmetry for both genders. So, for instance, a woman could be 30lbs overweight and still be considered "biologically attractive" if her waist-to-hip ratio was right.. yet our society would't consider her attractive in general.
Then you have women in particular being attracted to status, power and money... I mean seriously, how many rock stars are really attractive? Not many... in fact a lot of them are damn ugly. Misshapen faces, scrawny bodies... yet women just drool over their "talent." Seriously, if you're ugly and you want hot women learn to play the guitar.
That's simply not true. I don't feel the need to respond to it. You resorted to an outright lie. There universal traits of attraction. You haven't read the literature if you've come to that conclusion.
Quote:
So you let other people tell you what you should find attractive? Have a mind of your own man. Don't let other people tell you what you "should be" or "should like."
Lol, yeh, someone told me that big-boobed, blue-eyed, round-assed girls who lick their lips are attractive, and ever since I've been attracted to that. Get fucking REAL, man!
This shit is deeply embedded into us. Tits = high estrogen and fertile. Ass = high estrogen and fertile. Is it just coincidence that the traits women say they find attractive are the same traits that come about as a result of high testosterone and therefore fertility? Look at Greek statues, look at Nordic mythical characters. All would be considered attractive today. Can't blame MTV there, pal.
Please, PLEASE stop bullshitting these guys into believing they can achieve the near on impossible. It's a horrible fact that your face dictates your dating life, but that's just how it is.