Preselection is very underrated as a PUA technique but it's very powerful when done correctly.

As David DeAngelo keeps saying "Attraction is not a choice" and the reason this is true is because all attraction operates on an unconscious level.

If you and your friends were in a club and a smoking hot HB10 walks by and everyone thinks she's super hot suppose I walked up to you and said "How do you know? You would most likely (eventually) reply with a list of physical attributes like: pretty face, nice ass, long legs, nice hair, huge tits etc.

Well the thing is: it's your genes telling you she's attractive via ancient hardwired pathways in your brain.

The reason you're here now is because your genes evolved to find such attributes attractive because they're indicators of fitness in a partner and mixing your genetic code with hers is very likely to result in healthy genetic propagators for you (your children.)

Thus: you're attracted. Those of your ancestors who weren't died off along with their own less discerning genes.

Well guess what. A preselected man is as attractive to a woman as an HB9/10 is to you.
You don't have to actually have all these women as sexual partners but as long as they are showing interest in you and you have a choice then that's good enough.

The reason is based on the differing evolutionary psychologies between men and women.

100,000's of years ago the business of a woman approaching a man was fraught with danger and could get her killed if you got it wrong. But...if a man was already preselected by a number of women then they had already done the hard work for you. You could keep your genes safe and speed things up dramatically in reproducing them. Thus...women who were attracted to preselected men reproduced more; the trait became dominant in the female population.

If you want to see just how powerful preselection is then just youtube some old Beatles concerts and you will get the idea.

It is kind of a catch 22, if you are so good that you can come off looking preselected, well then you do not need to even try seeming high value, because you are, since you are just that good.

That's all pseudoscience and you're running a mile with it too. The point of being hardwired to find things attractive doesn't run as deep as you're letting it on to be. The further being hardwired to find someone attractive is in birthing hips, scent(Which isn't universal) and it's grossly outdated and should be looked over with a fine comb because lets be honest: Most of where this comes from is 100+ years back when men knew what they needed to look for in a woman, it wasn't in your unconscious mind but something you consciously looked for back then for better value. Back in those days you wanted a woman to carry your line and give you children, it was VERY important to do that so wide birthing hips were important back then. It wasn't something that was hardwired from an evolutionary standpoint, it was just the most logical step to make consciously.

If anything what we're actually attracted to is not what we're "hardwired" to find attractive but what society tells us is attractive in general. Through our mental development as we grow up we pick attributes we find distinct and attractive in others as we mature. There are psychological reasons for our "choices" that stem from our own opinions and beliefs based on how we grew up and what we perceived to be higher value due to either a lack of a specific attribute in our lives or an abundance of it.

An example would be a typical case of a child who's mother was never there and was emotionally withdrawn from their child. This left a gap in the child's life leading to them seeking a mother figure for comfort. To them the ideal partner would be a woman who would take up the role of a mother, that would be something they're drawn to in a woman thus their own personal preference when seeking a companion is the one who will fill the gap they need to be filled.

Also, it's pure bullshit to say we're hardwired to find fit people attractive. The only extent of being "hardwired" to find someone who is fit as attractive is that they're not on their deathbed. It's all social psychology. Look in the past and ask yourself what was attractive, not what you see in the movies but what was actually attractive. In ancient Rome being fat was attractive. It was a form of social status, meaning you had the power and riches to feed yourself which was something people found attractive. It was High Value. If you were skinny it was Low Value because it showed you were poor. It wasn't hardwired, it was purely social perception.

Conversely, you should ask yourself why rockers find rockers attractive yet other social groupings don't or don't have them in as high regard as they would someone in their own social group. The reason is because you're a slave to the opinions of those around you and they very much do influence your opinion on matters especially what is and what is not attractive. Social psychology.

There are some -- SOME -- universally attractive traits such as being Alpha but that only remains universal because the meaning behind "Alpha" is interchangeable. It's constantly updated to reflect the current "alpha." Fast forward twenty years from now and I can promise you being "Alpha" will be much more different to what it is now. Even looking back twenty years ago being a "real man" was "Alpha", now you have to be borderline metrosexual to be seen as "Alpha" because that's what people perceive as being confident in this day and age.

The only "hardwiring" here is that we're slaves to social bonds and we will follow social trends because we're social creatures. Our attractions towards others based on physical looks are pretty much entirely down to what society as a whole considers to be attractive.

Even babies are more interested in attractive faces than average ones. If you know of any cultures were ugly women are found more attractive than beautiful women then let me know. Think of all the HB10's without a boyfriend