Quote:
Interesting, thank you. Yes, in fact, I've been reading the Art of Seduction by Robert Greene and I always thought it was the approach to pick up I'd prefer.
So, you think it is possible to have a "Love story" approach to pick up? I'm not interested in short term sex anyway.
Zan Perrion. He is the true lover amongst the PUA gurus. Through him romanticism survives amongst our scriptures.
...but everyone's still going to tell you that having sex with her sooner is better than later. You want something long-term and fulfilling? Having sex with her sooner will establish that much-needed physical and emotional connection that opens the doorway to such things.
Quote:
And you are right, lately she has been a bit more distant. I asked her: "Has something changed between us?" (Afc, I know) and she just responded: "No".
Push/Pull
Fractionation
Cat-string theory
Bait Hook Reel Release
2-steps forward, 1-step back
Tension loops
It's all the same crap regurgitated and/or reworded over and over again within the seduction community. It's tried and tested. Do it. Like I said before, keep the roller coaster car rolling.
You took your vacation by entrancing yourself into slacking off into your whole romantic fantasy of "being AFC." It's time to snap out of it and get back into the game (you never left it, though lol).
Quote:
Last night I told her: "You know, I liked you better before, when you said sweet things. I'll lose interest if you continue like that." And it seemed to help a bit, but still, I'll put a bit of distance between us anyway.
Small step in the right direction. Might have been uncalibrated in some ways, but it's better than crying on the phone about how much you need her to fill that gaping hole *cough*vagina*cough* in your heart or whatever you were doing in that first phase.
Quote:
Still, she's the kind of girl that always went for guys who were really into her, I mean, too much into her.
She lost her mother when she was very young (about four years old) i'm not going to tell you how because it is a horrible story and I respect her wish of secrecy.
Still, do you think girls who grew up without a mother figure need a different approach? Are there any advantages or disadvantages?
It seems to me that it is harder for her to LJBF someone, and it also makes her much more sensitive, which goes both ways. She can be really cruel and play with feelings, and she can be really insecure and needy.
What is your take on this? And sorry about the buttload of questions =).
The first psychology-related book I've ever read talked about "father-vacuums" and "mother-vacuums." It suggested that, when a child has had a lack of attention from either parent whilst growing up, they are more prone to seek attention from those of that respective gender later on in life.
I could just make an educated guess and assume that the girl you're talking about has some form of mother-vacuum and is therefore drawn to people who exhibit more feminine characteristics... but the fact that she is a woman who intrinsically desires a more masculine complement to her life probably leads to a lot of drama. I bet she has a consistent history of being drawn to more sensitive guys, then losing interest after a while. I can see that leading to a lot of complications in any effort to developing a positive, pro-social personality.
But, hey, I'm pretty much just talking out of my ass here with this whole mother-vacuum thing. Let's talk about more practical things you can actually use.
I mentioned that your "I'll lose interest if you continue like that" line felt a bit uncalibrated to me. I have a feeling that your PULL to complement your PUSH should not be disinterest. Desire begets desire, and that is probably even more true with this girl. Use something else to counterbalance your overzealous displays of Hollywood romance.
What should you use? That depends on your personality. Every person's personality can be labeled in a way that contradicts itself. There are many masculine archetypes that are highly attractive to women because of their contradictory (push/pull) nature.
There's the archetype of the seemingly uncaring jerk who has a genuinely caring and soft nature beneath the rough skin. There's the wild and crazy Tarzan-like man whom women can easily envision to be TAMED into a business suit and a briefcase full of stock options. Of course, there's also the guy who sends mixed signals in terms of his sexual/romantic interest because he's conflicted on the inside from his troubled past and dichotomous nature, but don't forget - we're not playing that card. There are plenty more masculine archetypes that involve contradictions. Use ANYTHING other than the last one I mentioned to work your push/pull. Make sure you use the archetype that suits you best.