When I'm with girls I feel their emotions by feeling, analyzing body language and looking for IoIs and I respond to them in the way they respond. But also use negs if the girl does or says something that I don't like. I'm not worring if she like me or not that is her problem. So for example when a girl is feeling attraction for me on a date I feel that and act accordingly. If she is not feeling attraction I'm not feeling attraction so I start building up attraction by DHVing and sending the "Attraction Switches" as described by Neil Strauss: http://www.bristollair.com/inner-game/u ... tches.html

I am changing my lifestyle so that I 1) look attractive, 2) act as the attraction switches are always on and 3) my talk is DHVing.

So is this emotions correlation that I have described above what is in L.a.s. V.e.g.a.s. Attributes by Neil Strauss the "E is for emotional compatibility". You can read more about "Las Vegas" here:
http://www.attractology.com/outergame/a ... action.php

"E is for emotional compatibility. You have to display you have an emotional side to you and you not simply a robot. So many guys are afraid to show any vulnerability because they believe it will make them appear weak or feminine. In reality, women love a man who can connect with them on a deeper, emotional level".

Is my emotional correlation a good thing as in "emotional compatibility" or a bad thing as in "needyness"?