Quote:
I am good at
fishing
any rts, turn based, fps.
beer pong-am known for my skills
other than that mainly solving problems and creating its a real gift
also an undergrad in psych
@ footie: you may believe what you think but this is truly wrong. You are young and should be taught correctly, throw that book away.
practice and skill are correlational but not absolutes. whether it is physical or mental.
for physical we have the olympics the supposed pinnacle
to say anyone at the olympic level trains less hard is a joke
Different groups have better biomechanics for certain sports. sprinting oppossed to marathons oppossed to weightlifting. leading to different groups to dominant certain sports such a slight margin but the margin that differetiates.
For mental abilities savants(austics with special genius skills) can do things that brains considered normal cannot. autism caused by genetic markers, Many disorders have genetic correlations thus genetic giftedness will also be correlated to genetics.
Mainstream psychology sums up a person as P=Situational+Genetics
Both answers complete a person.
Read identical twin studies for genetic correlations
Thanks for your response. But you are arguing that practice does not influence success in sprinting etc. I already totally agree with you, there are some sports/skills that rely heavily on genetics not practice, but I am not arguing that you can get better at them with practice, I am arguing that you can get better at activities that rely on
skills not genetics. I also agree that IQ is genetic and do not dispute that.
And what you are saying about P=Situational + Genetics
That is totally irrelevant, we all know that, and I am not arguing that a person is either fully situation or fully genetic. I am saying that we don't inherit skills and they are situational. This can be shown by members of your familly:
My mum and dad are great at arty things. If your inference that genetics are responsible for skills is true. Then all three children would be good or naturally gifted at art. Lets just put it this way, I am absolutely shocking at all things art related, same goes for my brother (my sister is good at art though). I am completely opposite to my parents, (my parents were never good at sports), and me and my brother prove that genetics are not the basis for expertise. I am a very good footballer (soccer) and have been scouted for Chelsea and my brother is a very good rugby player.
On closer examination we can see why my and my brother are sh*t at art and my sister is good. I hate art, I find it boring and pointless and have never persued it further than in school. Same goes for my brother. You might say "well you never tried at it and thats why your sh*t". Even when I tried I was awful. That is mainly because whilst some kids were drawing paintings and sketching, I was outisde in the garden kicking a ball around, having no passion at all for art. And it's quite simple for my sister, she loves drawing.