Mystery's concepts- not canned lines



Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests
Post new topic Reply to topic   Board index » Tools & Techniques of Game: Meeting, Attracting and Seducing Women » Natural Game




Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Dec 04, 2009 9:16 am 
Offline
Member of MPUA Forum

Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2009 6:33 am
Posts: 110
Website: http://Streetstylestunters.com
Location: Duluth MN
I think his method works great but only use the concept. Not the canned lines. MM is simply Mystery's natural game that he was able to put on paper. He is so smart that he annalized his own mind and came up with a step by step how his brain works. And people pay to get inside his head... If you follow the canned lines you will never be as good as him. Even Style says it in his book, that all their doing is making clones. A clone will never be as good as the original because they're always one step ahead and your left waiting for them to tell you what to say next. Build on the concepts that Mystery has blessed us with and start to work YOUR natural game.


Top
   
PostPosted: Fri Dec 04, 2009 1:23 pm 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2007 6:58 pm
Posts: 5702
Location: Nashville
Quote:
I think his method works great but only use the concept. Not the canned lines. MM is simply Mystery's natural game that he was able to put on paper. He is so smart that he annalized his own mind and came up with a step by step how his brain works. And people pay to get inside his head... If you follow the canned lines you will never be as good as him. Even Style says it in his book, that all their doing is making clones. A clone will never be as good as the original because they're always one step ahead and your left waiting for them to tell you what to say next. Build on the concepts that Mystery has blessed us with and start to work YOUR natural game.
I agree with you on this for the most part. I started out using Mystery Method using their canned lines to build my confidence. Then I started improvising my own lines while still using the general layout of the method. Then more and more started testing the waters mixing in other stuff. The flow of his natural game works pretty well for me at least.

The only thing I disagree with is that Mystery isn't the one who analyzed his game. It was actually done at Project Hollywood by some of the other guys there like Tyler Durden. Anyways, that's kind of trivial but still I know what you are getting at.

The idea of Attraction, Comfort, then Seduction is a good mental idea to get in your head. Just so long as you realize it doesn't have to be linear like this. For example, if you already have Comfort with a girl then add Attraction before you can get to Seduction. If you have Attraction then add Comfort. If you go from Attraction to Seduction quickly, go back and add Comfort before buyers remorse comes into play, etc.

Good post.

Jon

_________________
Been around the world twice, Talked to everyone once...


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Dec 04, 2009 6:30 pm 
Offline
Member of MPUA Forum

Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2009 6:33 am
Posts: 110
Website: http://Streetstylestunters.com
Location: Duluth MN
Hey thanks for the reply. I should correct myself in saying not to use MM canned lines because some of them are priceless. I agree I like the flow of Mystery's game. It works and frankly girls seem more interested when your playing little games and routines with them.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Dec 13, 2009 11:37 am 
Offline
Member of MPUA Forum

Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2008 3:32 pm
Posts: 183
Location: Manchester
The concepts in MM, although many are genius, are not his natural game.

For example throwing a girl a neg because it is tactically the right thing to do at that moment in the interaction is not natural. It would only be natural if she really did have lint on her top, shoes you don't like or whatever and you were just saying that because it came to your head at that moment.


Peace,

kowalski

_________________
UK: www.puaforum.co.uk


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Dec 13, 2009 6:29 pm 
Offline
Member of MPUA Forum

Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2009 6:33 am
Posts: 110
Website: http://Streetstylestunters.com
Location: Duluth MN
Quote:
The concepts in MM, although many are genius, are not his natural game.

For example throwing a girl a neg because it is tactically the right thing to do at that moment in the interaction is not natural. It would only be natural if she really did have lint on her top, shoes you don't like or whatever and you were just saying that because it came to your head at that moment.
your so smart


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Dec 26, 2009 9:55 am 
Offline
Member of MPUA Forum

Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2008 3:32 pm
Posts: 183
Location: Manchester
Smart enough.


Peace,

kowalski

_________________
UK: www.puaforum.co.uk


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 07, 2010 10:49 pm 
Offline
MPUA Forum Enthusiast

Joined: Sun Jun 08, 2008 10:29 pm
Posts: 45
You're wrong kowalski. Negging is natural to the naturals that the technique was learned from. Naturals do what unnaturals do they just don't think about it consciously that much.

I agree with Gerlach. Like many others, I started out with mystery method and didn't get crap results. The canned stuff hardly ever worked. I then switched to natural game and did much better. However, the ideas that Mystery came up with are great. He threw light on a previously invisible world.

I've met many many puas and I've never met a single one that got Mystery method and routines to work except one who is now an instructor and does natural game now. Most of them started out using Mystery Method though.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 07, 2010 11:32 pm 
Offline
Member of MPUA Forum

Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2008 3:32 pm
Posts: 183
Location: Manchester
I agree driftwood. Both that Mystery's ideas threw a lot of light onto the murky concepts of attraction and seduction, and that naturals say things that could be classified as negs. I think the difference is in the motive.


Peace,

kowalski

_________________
UK: www.puaforum.co.uk


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 07, 2010 11:32 pm 
Offline
Member of MPUA Forum

Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2008 3:32 pm
Posts: 183
Location: Manchester
I agree driftwood. Both that Mystery's ideas threw a lot of light onto the murky concepts of attraction and seduction, and that naturals say things that could be classified as negs. I think the difference is in the motive.


Peace,

kowalski

_________________
UK: www.puaforum.co.uk


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 08, 2010 2:00 am 
Offline
Member of MPUA Forum

Joined: Mon Mar 10, 2008 1:41 pm
Posts: 171
I feel like people misunderstand the Mystery Method and the used of canned routines. First off, routines are only training wheels and they give you an idea of what to say. Eventually after being in field for so long, you will know what to say/do at the specific time. This is called microcalibration. Microcalibration replaces the "routine stack." There are certain canned lines that you should use in every set (negs, FTC's, etc). I only use 3 routines in every set which are my DHV stories. I don't have a stack because I know what to do and when. When I get an IOI, I give her a compliance test and then IOI her back, or maybe even change it up and give her an IOD with an IOI at the end. I always use what's called as a calibrator at the end of my IOI's and IOD's. Example: You know at first I thought you looked like a total bitch (IOD) but you're not! That's the funny thing (IOI). You can get away with a lot if you use this technique. Can the girl logically get mad at me for calling her a bitch? No because I didn't call her a bitch. If I get an IOD, then I IOD her back and then DHV and compliance test her. Once you get good, you have this super power and know what to do and when. This is what routines are used for. They get you to this point.

_________________
If you can't attract a woman you are, by definition sterile" ~Mystery

Your attitude, not your aptitude, will determine your altitude."
Zig Ziglar

To win you have to risk loss.
Jean-Claude Killy


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 12, 2010 3:56 am 
Offline
New to MPUA Forum

Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2009 4:08 am
Posts: 28
I've been studying differnt "methods" and adding it to my natural game and the results are getting better. I definitly see potential in the future. After reading alot of material, I noticed this is very similiar to sales technique. See I have a "natural" sales abilty. When I first became a trainer, i got 2 clients in my first week and had no idea on how to sell anything. Then i studied technique and sales skyrockets and I'm making almost double now.

Athletes have "natural' ability, yet the get coaches and trainers to enhance their skill.

I dont care how good someone is or think they are, learning technique will make you better everytime, no exception.

Confidence+technique=game


Top
   
 Post subject: Mystery
PostPosted: Wed Jan 13, 2010 7:30 am 
Offline
New to MPUA Forum

Joined: Fri Dec 11, 2009 7:26 am
Posts: 26
Mystery has become so socially savvy over many many years of experimentation and analysis that he can play his method naturally. However using canned lines is fine as long as u r able to fluff in a manner that is acceptable. Negging is a must but it is better to find something unique to neg about, build and expand on ur own ideas like style said, u dont become a football player by reading about the game


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: Mystery
PostPosted: Wed Jan 13, 2010 8:07 am 
Offline
Member of MPUA Forum

Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2009 9:46 am
Posts: 160
Quote:
Mystery has become so socially savvy over many many years of experimentation and analysis that he can play his method naturally. However using canned lines is fine as long as u r able to fluff in a manner that is acceptable. Negging is a must but it is better to find something unique to neg about, build and expand on ur own ideas like style said, u dont become a football player by reading about the game

I totally agree, expecialy about "u dont become a football player by reading about the game" You can read it, but you gotta get out there and test it. And with practice you will get good, and notice what you've done right or wrong.

Thats how i see it and thats what has been improving my self and my game.


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ] 

All times are UTC


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

Can we be honest?

We want your email address. Let me send you the best seduction techniques ever devised... because they are really good.
close-link