Read an recent blog posting by Cameron Teone (our own Johnny Soporno's Worthy Playboy brethren) on how one should consider closely the question of what kind(s) of women that one most easily attracts--in other words, one's "target demographic"...
From Mr. Teone's blog entry ( http://attractwomenanywhere.com/blog/20 ... mographic/ ) :
"The question is, what type of demographic do you get along with best? This is not about sheer physical beauty. There will be attractive girls in all demographics as I mentioned in the beginning You’re going to find very physically-attractive women in all areas: From the hot nerd/bookworm to the artist, to the spiritual-new age woman to the Paris Hilton wannabe club chick.
Every single person I’ve come across who is successful with women has a particular demographic. They didn’t sit there and consciously plan this. It just works out that way because certain type of personalities gravitate towards each other. Personality, lifestyle, culture are catalysts in this matter..."
As I'm still basically a newbie AFC doing research, I seem to get the impression that many PUA systems (and individual PUA's personal styles) are sort of "one size fits all"? Me, I certainly know full well the kinds of girls I tend to most easily achieve rapport with (and either befriend or date), as well as the opposite (for example: in my case, if the girl isn't much of a reader, or if she only reads crappy, unchallenging, sappy stuff--she and I will not only *not* relate to each other, but I won't be into her, no matter how much of an HB-whatever she is...ditto re: music, etc).
So, as I'm not sure if I really have a specific question here--what are your thoughts, folks? Do we sarge anyone, anywhere, anytime, all the time--just for the practice (as is often advised)? Or is it better, initially, to focus on the kinds of women we most readily connect to and desire? Perhaps it depends on the individual that's infield?
All best, everyone--and take care!
