| PUA Forum https://pick-up-artist-forum.com/ |
|
| Who are the most Experienced/Best PUAs in Forum https://pick-up-artist-forum.com/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=1745 |
Page 1 of 2 |
| Author: | beno101 [ Sun Dec 31, 2006 1:07 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Who are the most Experienced/Best PUAs in Forum |
Just wondering basically for all the new peoples sake who are the best/most experienced PUAs on here so we know who ask.... |
|
| Author: | Monkey [ Sun Dec 31, 2006 7:05 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
While this is something like asking who the "Best PUA in the world is," it is a question I think deserving of an answer. There seem to be two camps forming in the <a href="">PUA Forum</a>. One of them is a hardline get-a-girl-into-bed faction that relies heavilly on learned material and rote memorization. The method works, and it's powerful, but it lacks flexibility. The other is a more natural method that focuses on conversational skills and building an interaction towards a goal. While it is not as efficient at getting women into bed, it has much broader applications that the hardliners' method. Jaxin heads the hardliners, I head the conversationalists. Also worthy of note, I think, are Sakas and Game Boy. Both know their shit, and they seem fairly non-partisan. I'm likely missing a bunch, and this entire post seems horribly self-important, which is why I dislike questions like this... |
|
| Author: | Shaft [ Sun Dec 31, 2006 9:07 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
The Natural method is better, as it shows you who you can really be. It deveoples so you can come out of the shell and show the world who you really are. |
|
| Author: | beno101 [ Mon Jan 01, 2007 12:58 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
The natural method is the method i want to take...its so hard though. Its like facing your fear...which is why i need a wing or to attend a workshop to get me on the road...giving you the push out the door...im happy im chasing it now at 19 though i have my hole life ahead of me. This next year is going to be a important one i feel. |
|
| Author: | Shaft [ Mon Jan 01, 2007 4:10 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
I wouldn't say it's the hardest, just because of the fact it is already inside you. After a few rounds of figuring out your strong points and your weak points you will have an ego the size of Jaxin/Jesus. |
|
| Author: | Intrigue [ Thu Jan 04, 2007 2:27 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Hey, I'm new to these forums! I don't know about who is in here but I'm yet to meet a player I can't tool successfully while I'm out on the field so I look forward to sharing some knowledge! I know a decent amount of material and whatnot so I think I'll probably be an asset to your forums. My game began as technique-based, focusing mainly on cocky funny and swinggcat techniques (such as push/pull and tension loops), before moving on the the Mystery Method which I now swear by. Good to be here! 
|
|
| Author: | Shaft [ Thu Jan 04, 2007 5:06 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
I would like to point out there are alot of good PUA on this site, and you don't have to be the best to give out information or answer questions. |
|
| Author: | Monkey [ Thu Jan 04, 2007 5:09 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
A natural method of pick-up is challenging only in that it is difficult to prepare for. With structured methods, you have a bunch of lines you've memorized for any given situation, and you don't need to improvise very much to get where you're going. The benefit is having a lot of material for when you need it. The downside shows itself whenever the target acts in a way that is unexpected. A more natural method is more difficult in the beginning because it requires a lot of calibration, and you need to calibrate to every interaction you're in. It gets easier every time you do it, though. By the end, you have very few "routines," but you're an improv pro. You can adapt to any situation, no matter how out to lunch it may seem. |
|
| Author: | xfman [ Thu Jan 04, 2007 7:11 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
I have allways try to be orignial , I don't want to be a PUA robot that just says routines and memorized lines. I prefer to go out to the field and adapt to what I see in the field. Now I'm working on a more natural game trying to just bring up conversation and add some new stuff and have my own natural method and not only Pick up Lines. Right now I use the M3 from MM as a guide (Using the stages A1 - S3) adding new material, Like some cold reading , games to make the sarge fun and interesting. I love to improvise and want to add some new stuff to this whole new method that is 80 % natural and 20% a structured method with a C&F attitude and lot of confidence. |
|
| Author: | Methuselah [ Thu Jan 04, 2007 9:01 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
doesn't matter, we're all here to learn off of each other. ranking doesn't help anything except to fuel egos, which doesnt help shit. |
|
| Author: | Monkey [ Fri Jan 05, 2007 4:07 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
If my ego gets any more fuel, I may explode. ^_^ |
|
| Author: | Intrigue [ Mon Jan 08, 2007 8:43 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
As my game got better, I got lazier. I don't know if others noticed this, but I found myself more and more running "natural" game, simply because I couldn't be bothered reading more material. For me, the material was like the training wheels that slowly came off as I replaced them with my own shit talking. A smile and a wink say more than an hour of material without soul. |
|
| Author: | Tequila_Sunrise [ Mon Jan 08, 2007 9:41 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Well-put, Intrigue. The material put out by others should form a base to build on for yourself, rather than being copied and regurgitated over and over again. You'll find your experiences with women more rewarding when they like you for being yourself, rather than a Ross Jeffries clone. |
|
| Author: | Shaft [ Mon Jan 08, 2007 6:54 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
I wouldn't say you got lazier. Just because you are not reading the latest canned lines or Cold reading techniques does not imply you are getting lazy. As Monkey says the best study guides are out in the field. The fact that you were able to develope a natural game only implies that you are totally confident and really do not need that much "studied material" to have a connection with a chick. So ya basically you "lost your training wheels." |
|
| Author: | Monkey [ Mon Jan 08, 2007 7:15 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Lazy? Or did you just get so used to riding the bike you didn't need the training wheels anymore? This is what we usually call calibration. If you calibrate yourself toward a generally warm and open mind-set, and you calibrate to every situation individually, you will be powerful. In the field, you will rule supreme because no canned material can come close to rapport you're building. You should be able to catch and hold the interest of a 9 or 10 while ten other PUAs are trying out their best canned material, because you are genuine and you are an interesting person. Just my 2 pii. |
|
| Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|