| PUA Forum https://pick-up-artist-forum.com/ |
|
| Stealth Method Revised! *MUST READ* https://pick-up-artist-forum.com/viewtopic.php?f=55&t=15072 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | Incubus69 [ Sat Jan 19, 2008 5:49 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Stealth Method Revised! *MUST READ* |
I've posted the orginial STEALTH METHOD and got several critics. However, I've improved the idea for most PUA's, including me. STEALTH means hidden from view, or undetectable traces, or just Flying In Under The Radar. The new revised method consist of: 1) Demostrating High Value for the ladies by socialize with the guys and becoming Friends. (Working the room). 2) With those friends I ask quesitons more to learn about women; but which they haven't a slightest clue so you have to back up your knowledge. Test them I would say to see how much bull shit they really are. This will come across that you don't know what to do with women. (again this part may not be any good but let me know) 3) Pick a target and create a ROUTINE or have a ROUTINE ready. 4) Do what you normally do when picking up the ladies. Do you think this will cause less of a AMOG problem? I would think that making sure and NEUTRALIZING the males you will eventually be able to do a pick-up easily without causing much of a problem. (NOTE: THIS REVISED METHOD 50/50 has been field-tested. But however, you can revise any part of it and use it. I want all PUA's to use my STEALTH METHOD. If it works great-if not at least we can all revise it into something better!) |
|
| Author: | xxIcexx [ Sat Jan 19, 2008 6:35 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Dude like i said, it's your method, you have to do the trial and error, you cant force this upon the masses if you dont know it works. Personally, I wont go out of the way to deal with guys unless i have to. I usually have my own social circle with me when i go places, so i see no need to build anymore proof with random guys. I am far from a mpua, but I lean towards natural game so all these routines and canned lines are kept to a minimum and will only be used if i blank out. I'd be interested to know how this works out though. You said its 50/50 field tested, we need certainty. |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|