| PUA Forum https://pick-up-artist-forum.com/ |
|
| anyone heard of the gm style https://pick-up-artist-forum.com/viewtopic.php?f=55&t=10157 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | SUBlime [ Fri Nov 02, 2007 12:55 am ] |
| Post subject: | anyone heard of the gm style |
my wing way just walking up to girls and saying some pretty nasty shit than he chocked it up to "GM style" wtf |
|
| Author: | Archangel White Rose [ Fri Nov 02, 2007 1:55 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Maybe he's talking about Style Neil Strauss? Though I doubt it. Style doesn't advocate talking shit to girls. If anyone it would be DeAngelo, who advocates NEGs a bit too much sometimes. |
|
| Author: | PolarBear [ Fri Nov 02, 2007 8:18 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
I don't think it has anything to do with any of the gurus. Its an approach to overwhelming a chick with sexual induendos/rude comments. Followed up with a J/K or a "I'm sorry hug". Throwing all that sexual talk at her can get her horny. If you want a better description http://www.fastseduction.com/guide/03_A ... e/gm.shtml |
|
| Author: | A.P.P.L.E. [ Sun Nov 04, 2007 7:03 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
no no no.. GM style is otherwise known as "Grand Master Style". is was founded by a paris-based PUA named Grand Master. GM style is based in coutinuous smutty jokes and humerous sex-talk with keen attention to how the girl reacts. this is a very agressive style and is very high risk, but that is why you have to know how to use it. basically just opening up with "lets get bust" and without her getting a word in, you comeback with just kidding, just kidding. then you get at it again with another comment like the first. if you make it past this.. its a good indicator you can get her in bed. you will want to neg her negative, compliment yourself, call her a slut, quote her somehting naughty ill post some GM style openers for you in another post |
|
| Author: | The Doctor [ Thu Nov 08, 2007 12:50 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
GM style is something I pretty much operate naturally in. It's a case where you can get away with pretty much saying anything (wordswise) as long as your delivery, bodylanguage, and frame are strong enough. Heavy role reversal, naughty jokes, all done with cheeky/playful kind of vibe. |
|
| Author: | BadKarma [ Wed Nov 21, 2007 8:02 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Quote:
It's a case where you can get away with pretty much saying anything (wordswise) as long as your delivery, bodylanguage, and frame are strong enough.
My problem with this would be:a) I don't think I've got above three to handle this. b) Have you seen how foul-mouthed Aussie girls are? This would be a step in a classy direction for a lot of them. |
|
| Author: | Artist617 [ Wed Nov 21, 2007 9:46 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
gm style is natural, grand master style its a lost art. They said its like fool mate. Its a good style I have a big dick do you want to see it? Haha maybe later then if your good. I'm jk. |
|
| Author: | Methuselah [ Thu Nov 22, 2007 7:15 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
While it may work sometimes, it will almost never get you a real woman. Women who are receptive to it tend to be dumb, brainless, and overly promiscuous to begin with. This may be something that some guys look for, but not I. |
|
| Author: | Brad [ Thu Nov 22, 2007 7:18 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
As I remember, you are the author of that 'infamous' three-some thread? Quote: Women who are receptive to it tend to be dumb, brainless, and overly promiscuous to begin with. This may be something that some guys look for, but not I.
|
|
| Author: | Methuselah [ Thu Nov 22, 2007 7:22 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
And what does that have to do with GM style and its effectiveness Brad? Is there some sort of grudge you hold towards me that you'd like to publicly address. I never said anything about not wanting great sex or sex in general. But I would certainly like the women I have sex with to not be the town whorebag. I don't know, that's just me.... There is absolutely nothing wrong with GM style, but using it alone, in my opinion, will not yield the best results. |
|
| Author: | Brad [ Thu Nov 22, 2007 7:34 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
I suspect promiscuity and threesomes go hand-in-hand, unless someone would like to split hairs? As for a grudges, there are none; and the best way of resolving them is privately. |
|
| Author: | Methuselah [ Thu Nov 22, 2007 7:40 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Keyword: OVERLY PROMISCUOUS. Meaning, the girl that fucks the first guy who says something sexual towards her. There is nothing wrong with being promiscuous from time to time, because there is a time and a place for promiscuity, we've all been there, at least I hope so. Anyway, I shared my viewpoint on GM style before, and overall I think it is lackluster, that's all I needed to share. |
|
| Author: | Brad [ Thu Nov 22, 2007 8:01 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Hmmm... splitting hairs! Free dictionary def. of promiscuous: Having casual sexual relations frequently with different partners; indiscriminate in the choice of sexual partners. |
|
| Author: | Methuselah [ Thu Nov 22, 2007 8:31 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Thanks dude! I didn't know that! |
|
| Author: | Starbuck [ Fri Nov 23, 2007 1:34 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
My take.. It depends upon the guy. The right guy can pull almost any style off, with an available and receptive woman as long as it meets these four criteria. It is confident/bold. It is socially contextual. It builds sexual attraction/tension. It escalates. Establishing a sexual baseline or goal with a woman early in an interaction is always a good thing. There are two ways in which to do it. Direct and indirect. Too many guys seek to handle women with kid gloves and as naive entities especially early in an interaction. This is neither confident/bold nor does it build sexual attraction/tension. This is a critical mistake in my opinion, wastes time, often frustrates women and causes them to make assumptions and generalities about you that are less than flattering. Remember women are socialized to think of all men as 'dogs'. So if you are exhibiting non-dog behavior you are setting the wrong frame for the interaction and you give her far too much time to think of why she shouldn't consider you as a partner. I believe the term is 'boring'. This is rooted in being too 'invested' in the outcome. Either of you have the prerogative to end the escalation at any point if it seems not to be in your best interest. Here..., PMZ members can read my newest member journal entry, 'why rejection is good for you' for more context. why-rejection-is-good-for-you-vt11515.html |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|