girls who like you will not mention their boyfriends, and girls who don't like you will make up the fact that they have one.

Yes, because we all know that a woman knows no loyalty and will let you go the moment she can have someone better. Thats why the women dont make the great revolutions in science and society, but wait for the men to do it and then hook up with the winner.

"how long have you had that problem?" Lolz

The truth is that those are just funny quips to say in response to "I have a boyfriend" in order to get a laugh and to save face. But they won't get you very much further than that.

The boyfriend line is an iod and never a good sign, especially considering that girls who like you will not mention their boyfriends, and girls who don't like you will make up the fact that they have one. However, there are still a number of girls out there who have legitimate boyfriends and feel compelled to let you know.

What you want to do is not act like you just got rejected. Maintain a solid frame. You also don't want to act like you are some asshole who tries to get girls to cheat on their man. You can be like, "That's cool, I just got out of a committed relationship myself." This conveys that you are relationship material and gets her thinking about "getting out of a relationship". A little NLP action there. Then you can keep talking to her about other stuff and not push the number/date thing. If you still want to go for the number at the end you can ask her again and say "You seem really cool, let me put you in my phone on my friends list." You don't need to say anything about going out with her or maybe she'll be single one day. That's not necessary. Just make it really easy and casual and non-pressured for her to give you her number and then you can worry about working around the boyfriend issue at a later time.

Yes, because we all know that a woman knows no loyalty and will let you go the moment she can have someone better. Thats why the women dont make the great revolutions in science and society, but wait for the men to do it and then hook up with the winner.

But, PUA Ninja, here you forget the fact that women seek to compete with men in not only areas of status and prestige, but also financially, and at the same time they want to be admired for their wits and merits, while also using their bodies and looks to get guys to buy them drinks. A woman always wears more makeup when applying for her new job than when going to work on her present.

Also we exchanged thoughts previously about the female attraction to "alpha males," and concluded that the "alpha males" of today, AKA Hollywood / MTV / PUA culture are not genetically superiour, but rather the foam on the waves, what comes drifting atop of a society that has replaced rationality, loyalty and creativity with whimsicalness, no strings attached and a hankering after fickle fame.

The theory about the pursuit of genetic superiority does not apply in a society which has replaced natural selection by massive scale technology to provide for our needs. Parasitism rules above all, and it is the duty of society to control the parasitic traits of women. When a society fails in this, it means it enters a sliding slope towards the collapse of the respective civilization. Plato argued this in his Republic, as did Montesquieu in his l'Espirit de Lois.

EDIT: Also, also, also, this just flashed through my mind as I was going to the toilet; in the natural world, a display of strength, force and power is welcomed, embraced and submitted to. Strength, force and power mean virility, vividness and fertility. In the natural world the dictum applies that the strong always shape their own chances, redefine reality to their terms, and use force to make opportunities appear. In the human cultural world, by contrast, there is feminist rhetoric and it is prevalent. This goes among the memes of: "Women have always been repressed by men in all of history. They had all this potential, yet never had a chance. So now we need to have quotas, special SPAM, and exemptions from some rigid rules so that women can fully participate in society. And we are the political class standing up for this group, so we are morally good and righteous, and anyone opposing us must obviously not be good and righteous." With other words, instead of admitting that those with potential create their own chances, the weak/powerless are used as a shield/cover for select (politically correct) groups to gain power in their name. This is what feminism is doing nowadays (this analogy can also be extended from feminism to Christianity and socialism).

I always say "Tell him he's a lucky lad."

It usually works, as it's an NLP link to getting her to believe she is worth better than what she already has got.

Sweet Jesus. There is so much truth in these posts. Mr. Marville, I made an account just applaud your intelligence. Bravo.

Yes, because we all know that a woman knows no loyalty and will let you go the moment she can have someone better. Thats why the women dont make the great revolutions in science and society, but wait for the men to do it and then hook up with the winner.

But, PUA Ninja, here you forget the fact that women seek to compete with men in not only areas of status and prestige, but also financially, and at the same time they want to be admired for their wits and merits, while also using their bodies and looks to get guys to buy them drinks. A woman always wears more makeup when applying for her new job than when going to work on her present.

Also we exchanged thoughts previously about the female attraction to "alpha males," and concluded that the "alpha males" of today, AKA Hollywood / MTV / PUA culture are not genetically superiour, but rather the foam on the waves, what comes drifting atop of a society that has replaced rationality, loyalty and creativity with whimsicalness, no strings attached and a hankering after fickle fame.

The theory about the pursuit of genetic superiority does not apply in a society which has replaced natural selection by massive scale technology to provide for our needs. Parasitism rules above all, and it is the duty of society to control the parasitic traits of women. When a society fails in this, it means it enters a sliding slope towards the collapse of the respective civilization. Plato argued this in his Republic, as did Montesquieu in his l'Espirit de Lois.

EDIT: Also, also, also, this just flashed through my mind as I was going to the toilet; in the natural world, a display of strength, force and power is welcomed, embraced and submitted to. Strength, force and power mean virility, vividness and fertility. In the natural world the dictum applies that the strong always shape their own chances, redefine reality to their terms, and use force to make opportunities appear. In the human cultural world, by contrast, there is feminist rhetoric and it is prevalent. This goes among the memes of: "Women have always been repressed by men in all of history. They had all this potential, yet never had a chance. So now we need to have quotas, special SPAM, and exemptions from some rigid rules so that women can fully participate in society. And we are the political class standing up for this group, so we are morally good and righteous, and anyone opposing us must obviously not be good and righteous." With other words, instead of admitting that those with potential create their own chances, the weak/powerless are used as a shield/cover for select (politically correct) groups to gain power in their name. This is what feminism is doing nowadays (this analogy can also be extended from feminism to Christianity and socialism).