PUA Forum
https://pick-up-artist-forum.com/

Revenge of the nerds (scientific study)
https://pick-up-artist-forum.com/viewtopic.php?f=39&t=34640
Page 1 of 1

Author:  intron [ Mon Dec 15, 2008 10:12 pm ]
Post subject:  Revenge of the nerds (scientific study)

Quote:
Brainiacs, rejoice! The most sophisticated study on the subject so far suggests that, when it comes to choosing a mate, females value intelligence and creativity independent of a guy's looks.
Just what makes men and women attractive to the opposite sex? We don't need science to tell us that a nice body and good personality help. But when it comes to traits such as intelligence and creativity, an experiment or two is useful. Until now, however, most data have come from surveys, often asking abstract questions such as, "How important to you is a man's intelligence?" To gauge how smarts can affect women's mate choices in real-life situations, evolutionary psychologist Mark Prokosch of Elon University in North Carolina and researchers at the University of California, Davis, brought romance back to the laboratory.

The team recruited 15 men with a median age of 19 to take the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, a standard intelligence test. The volunteers were then filmed in three separate scenarios designed to reveal intelligence and creativity. They included reading headlines from news agencies such as the BBC, answering an open-ended question such as how the discovery of life on Mars might change their perspective of life on Earth, and responding to queries about why they would make a good date. These tasks might seem random, but previous studies have shown that whether someone stumbles over unfamiliar text or whether he can provide a pithy response to an unexpected question gives clues to his overall intelligence and creativity. The researchers also filmed the men playing Frisbee, so viewers could get a sense of their physical attractiveness.

So what did women think? The team showed the men's video profiles to 204 female undergraduates and asked them to rate the guys on criteria such as intelligence, creativity, overall attractiveness, appeal as a long-term versus a short-term mate, and potential dependability. The researchers used statistical tools to tease out how much a man's rating on any particular measure, such as intelligence, affected his scores on overall desirability as a long-term mate. As expected, physical attractiveness had the biggest impact, accounting for almost 40% of a man's appeal as a long-term mate. But when the researchers factored out the effect of looks, they found that intelligence and creativity made small but significant contributions to a guy's desirability as a short-term or long-term partner. The researchers report their results next month in the journal Evolution and Human Behavior.

Finding an intelligent and creative mate matters, because smart guys may contribute better genes and themselves be better providers for children, Prokosch says. Evolutionary psychologist Geoffrey Miller of the University of New Mexico in Albuquerque, who has done extensive research on intelligence and partner selection, agrees and praises the researchers for using the videos--physical observations of how men might act in the real world. "This is a much more realistic study of attraction to intelligence than we've done before."
http://sciencenow.sciencemag.org/cgi/co ... 008/1212/2

Author:  Stormy [ Tue Dec 16, 2008 12:47 am ]
Post subject: 

Stormy disagrees with the methodology of this study! I'd be more convinced if they had a couple of guys go out and game up 204 female undergrads and THEN compare and contrast what the girls think of them. These girls didn't actually get to interact with any of the guys.

Author:  intron [ Tue Dec 16, 2008 3:14 am ]
Post subject: 

Yes, but how would one control for all the variables you're measuring? It's not like you can take two guys who exactly match up on everything except, say, sense of humor to go over to "equivalent" sets and game them equally. This was a study on woman's perceptions, and this sort of study is really about as good as it can get in terms of performing a controlled set of experiments that can be reproduced.

I think the take away message from this study is that, yes, looks matter. In fact, they matter more than any other variable viewed in isolation. However, all the variables aren't gauged in isolation by woman, and they gauge things like intelligence and creativity independently from looks.

Author:  Chief [ Tue Dec 16, 2008 1:49 pm ]
Post subject: 

IMO any research measured by survey data isn't properly controlled, especially when women are surveyed on how they perceive men's attractiveness. Too many social scripts come into play when it comes to women's self-perceived preferences.

Sure, the old survey data of David M. Buss studies hold some credibility, but so do the theories of Freud and Piaget... many of their theories were proven to be incorrect.

Best way to measure results: physiological responses that are natural to the human courtship cycle in response to being exposed to those videos.

Even so, you're only going to gain some domain-general knowledge about male-to-female attraction while the theories offered by the seduction community will still provide more accurate domain-specific knowledge about it.

Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/