Quote:
-1 to 1 scale:
-1 = i won't hit it
0 = maybe
+1 = i'd hit it
Good call... but the real scale is 0-1-1 = i won't hit it
0 = maybe
+1 = i'd hit it
0=maybe
1=i'd hit it.
no reason for the -1
| PUA Forum https://pick-up-artist-forum.com/ |
|
| HBI - The Hot Babe Index https://pick-up-artist-forum.com/viewtopic.php?f=25&t=26287 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | Qlass [ Mon Aug 11, 2008 2:36 am ] |
| Post subject: | HBI - The Hot Babe Index |
So in Field Reports most women are classified on a basis of 1 - 10 (and I'm assuming that average is an HB7). But everyone's tastes are different. How does one tell if a girl is an HB7 or an HB8? A 9 or a 10? Is it possible to create an index of pictures (quite likely from the internet) that could help to better classify the different girls we see, ranging across the broad spectrum of all races and cultures? This might help to better picture what is happening in a field report. I'd rather that personal pictures not be posted. If famous / semi-famous / infamous girls from the internet can be found, probably for the best. Hope to hear your opinions. Q. |
|
| Author: | Toes [ Mon Aug 11, 2008 2:42 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
That is a great idea. Way to go Qclass. |
|
| Author: | Locke [ Mon Aug 11, 2008 3:14 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
reference: the-hb-scale-improved-drastically-repost-vt26264.html I just reposted that today |
|
| Author: | MattJacks [ Mon Aug 11, 2008 3:19 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
there was a post on this. it was title hot or not or something. unfortunatly in the results there are 4577 ones with that apparently lol. the results of that one showed how different each person is. how there can be no universal rating when individuals think about each person differently and look for dif things |
|
| Author: | Chief [ Mon Aug 11, 2008 3:48 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
I personally don't use the 1-10 scale because I think it's a highly subjective scale based on ego and objectification. Everyone has different tastes and trying to index a scale of what kind of girl is what number is futile. |
|
| Author: | ConspiracyTheory [ Mon Aug 11, 2008 4:08 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
yup, this is the same reason gymnastics isn't a real sport, the scoring is subjective to the judges. so if we want an official numerical HB rating system we should establish a PUAF panel of judges to rate pictures of these HBs and then average the score... or you could put her picture on hotornot for a day and see what it gets, just make sure she doesn't find out. personall i don't care to try to quantify a girl's looks, that's why i use the -1 to 1 scale: -1 = i won't hit it 0 = maybe +1 = i'd hit it |
|
| Author: | MattJacks [ Mon Aug 11, 2008 4:23 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Quote:
personall i don't care to try to quantify a girl's looks, that's why i use the -1 to 1 scale:
-1 = i won't hit it 0 = maybe +1 = i'd hit it hahahaha thats awesome |
|
| Author: | B-radd [ Mon Aug 11, 2008 4:58 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
there is a chart, its even posted somewhere in this forum ive seen it before, i just dont know which thread. But it sucks anyways, you can never be too accurate with that rating system cause ppl are attracted to differwent things, my 8 might be someones 10. or vice versa |
|
| Author: | Locke [ Mon Aug 11, 2008 5:10 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Quote: there is a chart, its even posted somewhere in this forum ive seen it before, i just dont know which thread.
exactly why the new system should be based off of personal opinions and a much simpler base. But it sucks anyways, you can never be too accurate with that rating system cause ppl are attracted to differwent things, my 8 might be someones 10. or vice versa check out the PA/MA HB Scale Redone post in the lounge |
|
| Author: | Nogame [ Mon Aug 11, 2008 6:44 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
I tend not to give girls numbers, I rate them as fuckable, Paper-bagable, super fuckable, warpigs, and Meh. Its all based on personal opinion, and it will always be. |
|
| Author: | Qlass [ Tue Aug 12, 2008 11:25 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
All very good points. I do realize that it is very subjective to "rank" women based on their looks (as shallow as that may seem but whatever). I was just hoping that there may be some common ground in terms of the "HBI". I'll definitely check out the recommended posts. Thanks! Q. |
|
| Author: | Chino Kapone [ Tue Aug 12, 2008 11:58 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Quote: -1 to 1 scale:
Good call... but the real scale is 0-1-1 = i won't hit it 0 = maybe +1 = i'd hit it 0=maybe 1=i'd hit it. no reason for the -1
|
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|